TRS vs. JNJ

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

TRS (TriMas Corporation) and JNJ (Johnson & Johnson) are both stocks. TRS operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while JNJ operates in Drug Manufacturers - General (Healthcare). Over the past 10 years, TRS returned 8.81%/yr vs 10.21%/yr for JNJ. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

TRS vs. JNJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TriMas Corporation (TRS) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRS achieves a 10.72% return, which is significantly lower than JNJ's 13.72% return. Over the past 10 years, TRS has underperformed JNJ with an annualized return of 8.81%, while JNJ has yielded a comparatively higher 10.21% annualized return.

TRS

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: -5.77%
• YTD: 10.72%
• 6M: 17.23%
• 1Y: 53.23%
• 3Y*: 13.14%
• 5Y*: 4.37%
• 10Y*: 8.81%

JNJ

• 1D: 2.02%
• 1M: 4.22%
• YTD: 13.72%
• 6M: 16.55%
• 1Y: 55.27%
• 3Y*: 17.11%
• 5Y*: 10.05%
• 10Y*: 10.21%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRS vs. JNJ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TRS TriMas Corporation	10.72%	45.02%	-2.29%	-8.13%	-24.60%	16.97%	0.83%	15.10%	2.02%	13.83%
JNJ Johnson & Johnson	13.72%	47.48%	-4.81%	-8.58%	5.97%	11.44%	10.82%	16.22%	-5.13%	24.43%

Correlation

The correlation between TRS and JNJ is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.03
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.13
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.16
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2007	0.25

Over the past year, the correlation between TRS and JNJ has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.25, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap TRS : $1.47B JNJ : $569.17B
EPS TRS : $22.78 JNJ : $8.65
PE Ratio TRS : 1.72 JNJ : 26.92
PEG Ratio TRS : 0.02 JNJ : 0.90
PS Ratio TRS : 1.80 JNJ : 5.88
PB Ratio TRS : 1.01 JNJ : 7.01
Total Revenue (TTM) TRS : $867.79M JNJ : $96.36B
Gross Profit (TTM) TRS : $197.79M JNJ : $66.60B
EBITDA (TTM) TRS : $126.92M JNJ : $31.62B

Return for Risk

TRS vs. JNJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRS

TRS Risk / Return Rank: 80
TRS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
TRS Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
TRS Omega Ratio Rank: 79
TRS Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
TRS Martin Ratio Rank: 78

JNJ

JNJ Risk / Return Rank: 94
JNJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
JNJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
JNJ Omega Ratio Rank: 95
JNJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
JNJ Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRS vs. JNJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TriMas Corporation (TRS) and Johnson & Johnson (JNJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRS	JNJ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.71	3.30	-1.58
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.39	4.77	-2.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.59	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.40	5.07	-2.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.74	15.08	-9.33
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRS vs. JNJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRS Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is lower than the JNJ Sharpe Ratio of 3.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRS and JNJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRS	JNJ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.71	3.30	-1.58
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14	0.60	-0.46
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28	0.55	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	0.54	-0.37

Drawdowns

TRS vs. JNJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRS drawdown since its inception was -93.99%, which is greater than JNJ's maximum drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRS and JNJ.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRS	JNJ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.99%	-50.67%	-43.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-22.24%	-10.96%	-11.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-30.02%	-15.95%	-14.07%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-47.21%	-18.41%	-28.80%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-47.21%	-27.37%	-19.84%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.31%	-5.81%	-2.50%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.40%	-11.88%	-15.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.29%	3.68%	+5.61%

Volatility

TRS vs. JNJ - Volatility Comparison

TriMas Corporation (TRS) has a higher volatility of 10.05% compared to Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) at 5.90%. This indicates that TRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JNJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRS	JNJ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.05%	5.90%	+4.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	22.87%	12.49%	+10.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.23%	16.85%	+14.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.00%	16.87%	+14.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.63%	18.46%	+13.17%

Dividends

TRS vs. JNJ - Dividend Comparison

TRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than JNJ's 2.25% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JNJ Johnson & Johnson	2.25%	2.48%	3.40%	3.00%	2.52%	2.45%	2.53%	2.57%	2.74%	2.38%	2.73%	2.87%
TRS TriMas Corporation	0.41%	0.45%	0.65%	0.63%	0.58%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	32.28%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRS and JNJ in my portfolio?

TRS and JNJ have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TRS or JNJ?

TRS has higher volatility (10.05%) compared to JNJ (5.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRS dropped -93.99% vs JNJ's -50.67%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JNJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 1.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.