TRS vs. NTES
TRS (TriMas Corporation) and NTES (NetEase, Inc.) are both stocks. TRS operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while NTES operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, TRS returned 8.81%/yr vs 15.14%/yr for NTES. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TRS vs. NTES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRS achieves a 10.72% return, which is significantly higher than NTES's -11.80% return. Over the past 10 years, TRS has underperformed NTES with an annualized return of 8.81%, while NTES has yielded a comparatively higher 15.14% annualized return.
TRS
- 1D
- -0.96%
- 1M
- -5.77%
- YTD
- 10.72%
- 6M
- 17.23%
- 1Y
- 53.23%
- 3Y*
- 13.14%
- 5Y*
- 4.37%
- 10Y*
- 8.81%
NTES
- 1D
- -2.07%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- YTD
- -11.80%
- 6M
- -13.16%
- 1Y
- -4.85%
- 3Y*
- 12.38%
- 5Y*
- 3.07%
- 10Y*
- 15.14%
TRS vs. NTES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRS TriMas Corporation | 10.72% | 45.02% | -2.29% | -8.13% | -24.60% | 16.97% | 0.83% | 15.10% | 2.02% | 13.83% |
NTES NetEase, Inc. | -11.80% | 58.28% | -1.73% | 30.59% | -27.35% | 7.11% | 57.88% | 34.66% | -31.31% | 62.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRS and NTES is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2007 | 0.19 |
Fundamentals
TRS:
$1.47B
NTES:
$77.12B
TRS:
$22.78
NTES:
$52.95
TRS:
1.72
NTES:
2.26
TRS:
0.02
NTES:
0.11
TRS:
1.80
NTES:
0.67
TRS:
1.01
NTES:
0.47
TRS:
$867.79M
NTES:
$114.39B
TRS:
$197.79M
NTES:
$75.14B
TRS:
$126.92M
NTES:
$40.24B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRS vs. NTES — Risk / Return Rank
TRS
NTES
TRS vs. NTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TriMas Corporation (TRS) and NetEase, Inc. (NTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRS | NTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.00 | +0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.40 | -0.16 | +2.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.74 | -0.29 | +6.03 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRS | NTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.71 | -0.17 | +1.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.07 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.28 | 0.36 | -0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.43 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
TRS vs. NTES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRS drawdown since its inception was -93.99%, roughly equal to the maximum NTES drawdown of -96.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRS and NTES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRS | NTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.99% | -96.41% | +2.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.24% | -30.46% | +8.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.02% | -33.97% | +3.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.21% | -51.38% | +4.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.21% | -57.34% | +10.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.31% | -23.51% | +15.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.40% | -24.59% | -2.81% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.29% | 16.92% | -7.63% |
Volatility
TRS vs. NTES - Volatility Comparison
TriMas Corporation (TRS) has a higher volatility of 10.05% compared to NetEase, Inc. (NTES) at 9.11%. This indicates that TRS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NTES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRS | NTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.05% | 9.11% | +0.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.87% | 20.58% | +2.29% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.23% | 29.18% | +2.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.00% | 43.66% | -12.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.63% | 41.83% | -10.20% |
Dividends
TRS vs. NTES - Dividend Comparison
TRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than NTES's 2.53% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTES NetEase, Inc. | 2.53% | 2.21% | 2.74% | 1.88% | 2.10% | 0.80% | 0.97% | 3.19% | 0.71% | 1.05% | 1.36% | 0.98% |
TRS TriMas Corporation | 0.41% | 0.45% | 0.65% | 0.63% | 0.58% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 32.28% |
Financials
TRS vs. NTES - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TriMas Corporation and NetEase, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
TRS and NTES have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TRS has higher volatility (10.05%) compared to NTES (9.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRS dropped -93.99% vs NTES's -96.41%.
TRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRS and NTES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer