TRS vs. NTES
TRS (TriMas Corporation) and NTES (NetEase, Inc.) are both stocks. TRS operates in Specialty Industrial Machinery (Industrials), while NTES operates in Internet Content & Information (Communication Services). Over the past 10 years, TRS returned 8.90%/yr vs 14.83%/yr for NTES. Their 0.19 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
TRS vs. NTES - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRS achieves a 12.86% return, which is significantly higher than NTES's -1.62% return. Over the past 10 years, TRS has underperformed NTES with an annualized return of 8.90%, while NTES has yielded a comparatively higher 14.83% annualized return.
TRS
- 1D
- 4.91%
- 1M
- -4.95%
- 6M
- 15.07%
- YTD
- 12.86%
- 1Y
- 14.85%
- 3Y*
- 16.26%
- 5Y*
- 4.63%
- 10Y*
- 8.90%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.10%
NTES
- 1D
- 1.04%
- 1M
- 4.74%
- 6M
- 5.09%
- YTD
- -1.62%
- 1Y
- 7.24%
- 3Y*
- 9.48%
- 5Y*
- 7.75%
- 10Y*
- 14.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 23.08%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
NTES NetEase, Inc. | $107.85M | $123.08M | $125.51M |
| $17.99M | $16.43M | $20.03M |
TRS vs. NTES - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRS TriMas Corporation | 12.86% | 45.02% | -2.29% | -8.13% | -24.60% | 16.97% | 0.83% | 15.10% | 2.02% | 13.83% |
NTES NetEase, Inc. | -1.62% | 58.28% | -1.73% | 30.59% | -27.35% | 7.11% | 57.88% | 34.66% | -31.31% | 62.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRS and NTES is 0.13, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.14 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2007 | 0.19 |
Fundamentals
TRS:
$1.43B
NTES:
$85.08B
TRS:
$22.88
NTES:
CN¥52.90
TRS:
1.75
NTES:
17.01
TRS:
0.02
NTES:
0.80
TRS:
2.03
NTES:
5.07
TRS:
1.03
NTES:
3.53
TRS:
$767.61M
NTES:
CN¥114.39B
TRS:
$167.20M
NTES:
CN¥75.14B
TRS:
$121.71M
NTES:
CN¥40.24B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRS vs. NTES — Risk / Return Rank
TRS
NTES
TRS vs. NTES - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TriMas Corporation (TRS) and NetEase, Inc. (NTES). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRS | NTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.31 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.05 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.55 | 0.16 | +0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.26 | 0.26 | +1.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRS vs. NTES - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRS drawdown since its inception was -93.99%, roughly equal to the maximum NTES drawdown of -96.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRS and NTES.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRS | NTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -93.99% | -96.54% | +2.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.24% | -30.46% | +8.22% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.48% | -33.97% | +4.49% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -47.21% | -51.38% | +4.17% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -47.21% | -57.34% | +10.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.33% | -14.68% | +3.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.23% | -24.63% | -2.60% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.78% | 18.41% | -8.63% |
Volatility
TRS vs. NTES - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TriMas Corporation (TRS) is 8.52%, while NetEase, Inc. (NTES) has a volatility of 12.11%. This indicates that TRS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NTES based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRS | NTES | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.52% | 12.11% | -3.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.66% | 23.01% | +0.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.14% | 32.13% | -1.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.93% | 43.00% | -12.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.54% | 41.87% | -10.33% |
Dividends
TRS vs. NTES - Dividend Comparison
TRS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.40%, less than NTES's 2.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NTES NetEase, Inc. | 2.27% | 2.21% | 2.74% | 1.88% | 2.10% | 0.80% | 0.97% | 3.19% | 0.71% | 1.05% | 1.36% | 0.98% |
TRS TriMas Corporation | 0.40% | 0.45% | 0.65% | 0.63% | 0.58% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 32.28% |
Financials
TRS vs. NTES - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between TriMas Corporation and NetEase, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TRS vs. NTES - Profitability Comparison
TRS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TriMas Corporation reported a gross profit of 36.82M and revenue of 174.58M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 21.1%.
NTES - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NetEase, Inc. reported a gross profit of 21.22B and revenue of 30.59B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 69.4%.
TRS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TriMas Corporation reported an operating income of 6.74M and revenue of 174.58M, resulting in an operating margin of 3.9%.
NTES - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NetEase, Inc. reported an operating income of 12.66B and revenue of 30.59B, resulting in an operating margin of 41.4%.
TRS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, TriMas Corporation reported a net income of -795.00K and revenue of 174.58M, resulting in a net margin of -0.5%.
NTES - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, NetEase, Inc. reported a net income of 10.67B and revenue of 30.59B, resulting in a net margin of 34.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TRS and NTES have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NTES has higher volatility (12.11%) compared to TRS (8.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRS dropped -93.99% vs NTES's -96.54%.
TRS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.41 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRS and NTES
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer