PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRRNX vs. TBLLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRRNX vs. TBLLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement 2055 Fund (TRRNX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2050 Fund (TBLLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TRRNX having a 11.08% return and TBLLX slightly higher at 11.41%.


TRRNX

1D
-0.71%
1M
3.06%
YTD
11.08%
6M
7.17%
1Y
20.34%
3Y*
17.02%
5Y*
8.19%
10Y*
11.09%

TBLLX

1D
-0.76%
1M
3.31%
YTD
11.41%
6M
11.94%
1Y
26.69%
3Y*
19.45%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRRNX vs. TBLLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
TRRNX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2055 Fund
11.08%14.33%14.24%20.88%-19.17%3.40%
TBLLX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2050 Fund
11.41%20.35%15.04%21.21%-18.10%4.24%

Correlation

The correlation between TRRNX and TBLLX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 2, 2021

0.98

The correlation between TRRNX and TBLLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRRNX vs. TBLLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRRNX
TRRNX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
TRRNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRRNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRRNX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
TRRNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRRNX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

TBLLX
TBLLX Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
TBLLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TBLLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
TBLLX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
TBLLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
TBLLX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRRNX vs. TBLLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2055 Fund (TRRNX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2050 Fund (TBLLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRRNXTBLLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.54

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.41

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.16

2.87

-0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.99

12.72

-3.73

TRRNX vs. TBLLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRRNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the TBLLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRRNX and TBLLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRRNXTBLLXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

2.23

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.66

-0.19

Drawdowns

TRRNX vs. TBLLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRRNX drawdown since its inception was -53.59%, which is greater than TBLLX's maximum drawdown of -26.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRRNX and TBLLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRRNXTBLLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.59%

-26.50%

-27.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.84%

-9.43%

-0.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.61%

-16.11%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.03%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

-0.76%

+0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.57%

-6.57%

-1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.33%

2.12%

+0.21%

Volatility

TRRNX vs. TBLLX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Retirement 2055 Fund (TRRNX) and T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2050 Fund (TBLLX) have volatilities of 3.56% and 3.62%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRRNXTBLLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.56%

3.62%

-0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.37%

9.66%

+0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.56%

12.12%

+0.44%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.32%

15.54%

-0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.56%

15.54%

+0.02%

TRRNX vs. TBLLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRRNX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than TBLLX's 0.43% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRRNX vs. TBLLX - Dividend Comparison

TRRNX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TBLLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.22%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TBLLX
T. Rowe Price Retirement Blend 2050 Fund
2.22%2.47%1.92%1.72%1.96%2.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRRNX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2055 Fund
0.00%0.00%1.77%3.81%7.01%5.83%3.40%5.41%7.55%2.12%2.62%3.50%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, TRRNX and TBLLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TBLLX has higher volatility (3.62%) compared to TRRNX (3.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRRNX dropped -53.59% vs TBLLX's -26.50%.

TBLLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRRNX and TBLLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer