TRRMX vs. VT

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

TRRMX (T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both funds - TRRMX is a Target Retirement Date fund actively managed by T. Rowe Price, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. TRRMX is actively managed, while VT is passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TRRMX returned 10.76%/yr vs 12.39%/yr for VT. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. TRRMX charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.

Performance

TRRMX vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund (TRRMX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TRRMX having a 10.81% return and VT slightly higher at 11.15%. Over the past 10 years, TRRMX has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 10.76%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.39% annualized return.

TRRMX

• 1D: 1.78%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: 5.92%
• YTD: 10.81%
• 1Y: 17.43%
• 3Y*: 14.38%
• 5Y*: 7.90%
• 10Y*: 10.76%
• ALL TIME*: 8.09%

VT

• 1D: 0.26%
• 1M: -0.20%
• 6M: 7.80%
• YTD: 11.15%
• 1Y: 23.51%
• 3Y*: 18.19%
• 5Y*: 10.58%
• 10Y*: 12.39%
• ALL TIME*: 8.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
TRRMX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	$425.08M	$369.63M	$481.55M

TRRMX vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TRRMX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund	10.81%	14.26%	14.19%	20.85%	-19.09%	17.51%	18.67%	25.35%	-7.66%	20.83%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	11.15%	22.43%	16.49%	22.02%	-18.00%	18.27%	16.59%	26.81%	-9.76%	24.50%

Correlation

The correlation between TRRMX and VT is 0.95, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.95
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.95
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2008	0.96

The correlation between TRRMX and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TRRMX vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TRRMX

TRRMX Risk / Return Rank: 43
TRRMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
TRRMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
TRRMX Omega Ratio Rank: 42
TRRMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
TRRMX Martin Ratio Rank: 49

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 70
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 71
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 69
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TRRMX vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund (TRRMX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TRRMX	VT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	1.59	-0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	2.23	-0.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.29	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.64	2.29	-0.65
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.65	9.54	-2.88

TRRMX vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRRMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is comparable to the VT Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRRMX and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TRRMX vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRRMX drawdown since its inception was -53.59%, which is greater than VT's maximum drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRRMX and VT.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRRMX	VT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.59%	-50.27%	-3.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.74%	-9.67%	-0.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.50%	-16.51%	+1.01%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.95%	-26.38%	-1.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.51%	-34.24%	+1.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.95%	-1.84%	+0.89%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.52%	-6.97%	-0.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.38%	2.32%	+0.06%

Volatility

TRRMX vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund (TRRMX) is 3.49%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 3.99%. This indicates that TRRMX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRRMX	VT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.49%	3.99%	-0.50%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.91%	11.68%	-0.77%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.42%	13.96%	-0.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.35%	16.22%	-0.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.45%	17.18%	-1.73%

TRRMX vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRRMX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRRMX vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

TRRMX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.59%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TRRMX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund	0.00%	0.00%	1.88%	4.45%	7.81%	6.91%	4.33%	5.75%	8.56%	2.32%	3.08%	3.96%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.59%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRRMX and VT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.95, TRRMX and VT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TRRMX or VT?

VT has higher volatility (3.99%) compared to TRRMX (3.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRRMX dropped -53.59% vs VT's -50.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.