PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRRMX vs. SWYMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRRMX vs. SWYMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund (TRRMX) and Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund (SWYMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with TRRMX having a 11.69% return and SWYMX slightly higher at 12.17%.


TRRMX

1D
0.46%
1M
4.59%
YTD
11.69%
6M
8.00%
1Y
21.15%
3Y*
17.18%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
11.17%

SWYMX

1D
0.37%
1M
5.03%
YTD
12.17%
6M
12.74%
1Y
27.12%
3Y*
19.17%
5Y*
10.16%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRRMX vs. SWYMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRRMX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund
11.69%14.26%14.19%20.85%-19.09%17.51%18.67%25.35%-7.66%20.83%
SWYMX
Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund
12.17%19.42%14.24%20.92%-17.65%17.80%14.66%25.34%-7.58%20.48%

Correlation

The correlation between TRRMX and SWYMX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2016

0.96

The correlation between TRRMX and SWYMX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRRMX vs. SWYMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRRMX
TRRMX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
TRRMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRRMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRRMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
TRRMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRRMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

SWYMX
SWYMX Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
SWYMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SWYMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
SWYMX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
SWYMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
SWYMX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRRMX vs. SWYMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund (TRRMX) and Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund (SWYMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRRMXSWYMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.66

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.89

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.44

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

3.23

-0.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.45

14.39

-4.94

TRRMX vs. SWYMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRRMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the SWYMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRRMX and SWYMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRRMXSWYMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

2.45

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.69

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.75

-0.28

Drawdowns

TRRMX vs. SWYMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRRMX drawdown since its inception was -53.59%, which is greater than SWYMX's maximum drawdown of -30.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRRMX and SWYMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRRMXSWYMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.59%

-30.48%

-23.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.74%

-8.55%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.50%

-14.95%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.95%

-25.37%

-2.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.57%

-4.51%

-3.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

1.91%

+0.40%

Volatility

TRRMX vs. SWYMX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund (TRRMX) and Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund (SWYMX) have volatilities of 3.46% and 3.39%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRRMXSWYMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

3.39%

+0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.30%

8.93%

+1.37%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.37%

11.26%

+1.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.21%

14.72%

+0.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.49%

15.63%

-0.14%

TRRMX vs. SWYMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRRMX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than SWYMX's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRRMX vs. SWYMX - Dividend Comparison

TRRMX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SWYMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SWYMX
Schwab Target 2050 Index Fund
1.79%2.00%2.03%1.99%1.96%1.78%1.65%1.96%2.15%1.43%1.22%0.00%
TRRMX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund
0.00%0.00%1.88%4.45%7.81%6.91%4.33%5.75%8.56%2.32%3.08%3.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.94, TRRMX and SWYMX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TRRMX has higher volatility (3.46%) compared to SWYMX (3.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRRMX dropped -53.59% vs SWYMX's -30.48%.

SWYMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.45 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRRMX and SWYMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer