PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRRMX vs. FRAMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRRMX vs. FRAMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund (TRRMX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRRMX achieves a 10.91% return, which is significantly higher than FRAMX's 3.67% return. Over the past 10 years, TRRMX has outperformed FRAMX with an annualized return of 11.09%, while FRAMX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.91% annualized return.


TRRMX

1D
-0.70%
1M
3.00%
YTD
10.91%
6M
7.10%
1Y
20.12%
3Y*
16.91%
5Y*
8.16%
10Y*
11.09%

FRAMX

1D
-0.26%
1M
0.98%
YTD
3.67%
6M
3.95%
1Y
9.37%
3Y*
7.19%
5Y*
2.49%
10Y*
3.91%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRRMX vs. FRAMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRRMX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund
10.91%14.26%14.19%20.85%-19.09%17.51%18.67%25.35%-7.66%20.83%
FRAMX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A
3.67%9.55%4.04%7.80%-11.87%2.52%8.30%10.28%-2.05%6.82%

Correlation

The correlation between TRRMX and FRAMX is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2007

0.85

The correlation between TRRMX and FRAMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (5 years) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRRMX vs. FRAMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRRMX
TRRMX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
TRRMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3535
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRRMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRRMX Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
TRRMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRRMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

FRAMX
FRAMX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FRAMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FRAMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FRAMX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FRAMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
FRAMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRRMX vs. FRAMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund (TRRMX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRRMXFRAMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.47

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.15

2.87

-0.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.94

12.19

-3.26

TRRMX vs. FRAMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRRMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.69, which is comparable to the FRAMX Sharpe Ratio of 2.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRRMX and FRAMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRRMXFRAMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.69

2.38

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

0.47

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.72

0.87

-0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.52

-0.06

Drawdowns

TRRMX vs. FRAMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRRMX drawdown since its inception was -53.59%, which is greater than FRAMX's maximum drawdown of -33.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRRMX and FRAMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRRMXFRAMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.59%

-33.94%

-19.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.74%

-3.45%

-6.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.50%

-5.02%

-10.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.95%

-16.31%

-11.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.51%

-16.31%

-16.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.70%

-0.26%

-0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.57%

-3.83%

-3.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

0.81%

+1.50%

Volatility

TRRMX vs. FRAMX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund (TRRMX) has a higher volatility of 3.52% compared to Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A (FRAMX) at 1.68%. This indicates that TRRMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRAMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRRMXFRAMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.52%

1.68%

+1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.23%

3.42%

+6.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.39%

4.17%

+8.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.21%

5.28%

+9.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.49%

4.52%

+10.97%

TRRMX vs. FRAMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRRMX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than FRAMX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRRMX vs. FRAMX - Dividend Comparison

TRRMX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FRAMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.85%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FRAMX
Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement Income Fund Class A
2.85%2.77%2.77%2.58%4.26%3.31%2.23%2.37%4.40%8.26%1.42%1.42%
TRRMX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund
0.00%0.00%1.88%4.45%7.81%6.91%4.33%5.75%8.56%2.32%3.08%3.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRRMX and FRAMX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRRMX has higher volatility (3.52%) compared to FRAMX (1.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRRMX dropped -53.59% vs FRAMX's -33.94%.

FRAMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRRMX and FRAMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer