PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRRMX vs. DRILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRRMX vs. DRILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund (TRRMX) and Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRRMX achieves a 11.69% return, which is significantly lower than DRILX's 12.39% return. Over the past 10 years, TRRMX has underperformed DRILX with an annualized return of 11.17%, while DRILX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.69% annualized return.


TRRMX

1D
0.46%
1M
4.59%
YTD
11.69%
6M
8.00%
1Y
21.15%
3Y*
17.18%
5Y*
8.47%
10Y*
11.17%

DRILX

1D
0.35%
1M
5.03%
YTD
12.39%
6M
13.17%
1Y
28.14%
3Y*
20.47%
5Y*
11.73%
10Y*
12.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRRMX vs. DRILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRRMX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund
11.69%14.26%14.19%20.85%-19.09%17.51%18.67%25.35%-7.66%20.83%
DRILX
Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
12.39%19.66%17.10%21.37%-15.28%21.08%14.10%25.61%-9.07%21.51%

Correlation

The correlation between TRRMX and DRILX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.95

The correlation between TRRMX and DRILX shifts across timeframes, from 0.84 (1 year) to 0.95 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRRMX vs. DRILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRRMX
TRRMX Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
TRRMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRRMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRRMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
TRRMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRRMX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

DRILX
DRILX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
DRILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DRILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
DRILX Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
DRILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
DRILX Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRRMX vs. DRILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund (TRRMX) and Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRRMXDRILXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.08

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.52

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

3.70

-1.42

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.45

16.18

-6.73

TRRMX vs. DRILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRRMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is lower than the DRILX Sharpe Ratio of 2.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRRMX and DRILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRRMXDRILXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

2.87

-1.08

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

0.81

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

0.82

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.47

0.82

-0.35

Drawdowns

TRRMX vs. DRILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRRMX drawdown since its inception was -53.59%, which is greater than DRILX's maximum drawdown of -33.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRRMX and DRILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRRMXDRILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.59%

-33.48%

-20.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.74%

-8.58%

-1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.50%

-15.76%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.95%

-23.50%

-4.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.51%

-33.48%

+0.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.57%

-4.24%

-3.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.31%

1.88%

+0.43%

Volatility

TRRMX vs. DRILX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund (TRRMX) has a higher volatility of 3.46% compared to Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund (DRILX) at 3.12%. This indicates that TRRMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRRMXDRILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

3.12%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.30%

8.72%

+1.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.37%

11.07%

+1.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.21%

14.84%

+0.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.49%

15.75%

-0.26%

TRRMX vs. DRILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRRMX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than DRILX's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRRMX vs. DRILX - Dividend Comparison

TRRMX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DRILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DRILX
Dimensional 2060 Target Date Retirement Income Fund
1.34%1.47%2.40%3.26%3.97%2.25%2.11%2.12%2.25%0.91%1.96%0.00%
TRRMX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2050 Fund
0.00%0.00%1.88%4.45%7.81%6.91%4.33%5.75%8.56%2.32%3.08%3.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRRMX and DRILX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRRMX has higher volatility (3.46%) compared to DRILX (3.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRRMX dropped -53.59% vs DRILX's -33.48%.

DRILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.87 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRRMX and DRILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer