TRRLX vs. FRQIX
TRRLX (T. Rowe Price Retirement 2060 Fund) and FRQIX (Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 10 years, TRRLX returned 11.25%/yr vs 4.98%/yr for FRQIX. Their correlation of 0.82 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRRLX charges 0.64%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for FRQIX.
Performance
TRRLX vs. FRQIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRRLX achieves a 11.32% return, which is significantly higher than FRQIX's 3.60% return. Over the past 10 years, TRRLX has outperformed FRQIX with an annualized return of 11.25%, while FRQIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.98% annualized return.
TRRLX
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 1.34%
- YTD
- 11.32%
- 6M
- 11.09%
- 1Y
- 21.42%
- 3Y*
- 16.15%
- 5Y*
- 8.56%
- 10Y*
- 11.25%
FRQIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- 3.60%
- 6M
- 3.74%
- 1Y
- 9.41%
- 3Y*
- 7.28%
- 5Y*
- 2.83%
- 10Y*
- 4.98%
TRRLX vs. FRQIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRRLX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2060 Fund | 11.32% | 14.54% | 14.22% | 20.87% | -19.22% | 17.50% | 18.46% | 25.39% | -7.62% | 20.79% |
FRQIX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I | 3.60% | 9.97% | 4.48% | 8.52% | -12.39% | 3.82% | 9.58% | 12.63% | -2.84% | 10.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRRLX and FRQIX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2014 | 0.82 |
The correlation between TRRLX and FRQIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.72 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRRLX vs. FRQIX — Risk / Return Rank
TRRLX
FRQIX
TRRLX vs. FRQIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2060 Fund (TRRLX) and Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRRLX | FRQIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.52 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.83 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.44 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.22 | 2.75 | -0.53 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.11 | 11.51 | -2.40 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRRLX vs. FRQIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRRLX drawdown since its inception was -32.52%, smaller than the maximum FRQIX drawdown of -38.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRRLX and FRQIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRRLX | FRQIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.52% | -38.01% | +5.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.82% | -3.43% | -6.39% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -15.59% | -5.21% | -10.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.09% | -17.04% | -11.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -32.52% | -17.04% | -15.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.47% | -0.42% | -0.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.16% | -4.42% | -0.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.36% | 0.82% | +1.54% |
Volatility
TRRLX vs. FRQIX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2060 Fund (TRRLX) has a higher volatility of 4.96% compared to Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I (FRQIX) at 1.78%. This indicates that TRRLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FRQIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRRLX | FRQIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.96% | 1.78% | +3.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.06% | 3.68% | +7.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.23% | 4.35% | +8.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.39% | 5.60% | +9.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.56% | 5.34% | +10.22% |
TRRLX vs. FRQIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRRLX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is higher than FRQIX's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRRLX vs. FRQIX - Dividend Comparison
TRRLX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FRQIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FRQIX Fidelity Advisor Managed Retirement 2010 Fund Class I | 3.22% | 3.14% | 2.97% | 2.75% | 5.01% | 6.00% | 3.51% | 3.14% | 5.60% | 16.32% | 2.43% | 4.08% |
TRRLX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2060 Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.74% | 3.29% | 5.75% | 4.19% | 2.38% | 4.33% | 5.39% | 1.58% | 1.58% | 0.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRRLX and FRQIX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TRRLX has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to FRQIX (1.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRRLX dropped -32.52% vs FRQIX's -38.01%.
FRQIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRRLX and FRQIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer