PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRRGX vs. PRWCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRRGX vs. PRWCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement 2015 Fund (TRRGX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TRRGX having a 5.92% return and PRWCX slightly lower at 5.76%. Over the past 10 years, TRRGX has underperformed PRWCX with an annualized return of 6.57%, while PRWCX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.25% annualized return.


TRRGX

1D
0.07%
1M
1.87%
YTD
5.92%
6M
0.78%
1Y
8.36%
3Y*
9.40%
5Y*
4.12%
10Y*
6.57%

PRWCX

1D
-0.26%
1M
2.52%
YTD
5.76%
6M
5.87%
1Y
14.88%
3Y*
13.48%
5Y*
8.87%
10Y*
11.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRRGX vs. PRWCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRRGX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2015 Fund
5.92%6.04%8.85%13.01%-14.10%9.65%12.56%17.41%-4.24%13.36%
PRWCX
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund
5.76%12.45%12.50%18.85%-12.00%18.45%18.13%24.62%0.63%15.34%

Correlation

The correlation between TRRGX and PRWCX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.88

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 2, 2004

0.92

The correlation between TRRGX and PRWCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.92 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRRGX vs. PRWCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRRGX
TRRGX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
TRRGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRRGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRRGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
TRRGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRRGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1111
Martin Ratio Rank

PRWCX
PRWCX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
PRWCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRWCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRWCX Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
PRWCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRWCX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRRGX vs. PRWCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2015 Fund (TRRGX) and T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRRGXPRWCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.10

2.08

-0.98

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.37

2.97

-1.60

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.39

-0.14

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.17

2.45

-1.28

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.50

10.72

-7.22

TRRGX vs. PRWCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRRGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is lower than the PRWCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRRGX and PRWCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRRGXPRWCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

2.08

-0.98

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.70

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

0.89

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.56

0.91

-0.35

Drawdowns

TRRGX vs. PRWCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRRGX drawdown since its inception was -43.17%, roughly equal to the maximum PRWCX drawdown of -41.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRRGX and PRWCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRRGXPRWCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-43.17%

-41.77%

-1.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.30%

-6.32%

-0.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.47%

-15.96%

+8.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.89%

-17.07%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-21.31%

-26.86%

+5.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.42%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.63%

-3.33%

-1.30%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.43%

1.44%

+0.99%

Volatility

TRRGX vs. PRWCX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Retirement 2015 Fund (TRRGX) has a higher volatility of 2.02% compared to T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund (PRWCX) at 1.92%. This indicates that TRRGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRWCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRRGXPRWCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.02%

1.92%

+0.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.33%

6.04%

+1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.10%

7.45%

+0.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.65%

12.74%

-4.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.68%

12.74%

-4.06%

TRRGX vs. PRWCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRRGX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than PRWCX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRRGX vs. PRWCX - Dividend Comparison

TRRGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PRWCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.33%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRWCX
T. Rowe Price Capital Appreciation Fund
8.33%8.81%10.38%4.15%9.44%9.23%7.97%5.83%7.46%6.82%3.51%9.86%
TRRGX
T. Rowe Price Retirement 2015 Fund
0.00%0.00%4.00%5.52%12.45%11.34%9.02%5.24%10.35%7.28%1.62%3.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRRGX and PRWCX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRRGX has higher volatility (2.02%) compared to PRWCX (1.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRRGX dropped -43.17% vs PRWCX's -41.77%.

PRWCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRRGX and PRWCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer