TRRCX vs. VT

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

TRRCX (T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both funds - TRRCX is a Target Retirement Date fund managed by T. Rowe Price, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Over the past 10 years, TRRCX returned 8.81%/yr vs 12.93%/yr for VT. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TRRCX charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.

Performance

TRRCX vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund (TRRCX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRRCX achieves a 6.49% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 11.06% return. Over the past 10 years, TRRCX has underperformed VT with an annualized return of 8.81%, while VT has yielded a comparatively higher 12.93% annualized return.

TRRCX

• 1D: 1.51%
• 1M: -0.00%
• YTD: 6.49%
• 6M: 1.20%
• 1Y: 9.28%
• 3Y*: 11.17%
• 5Y*: 5.03%
• 10Y*: 8.81%

VT

• 1D: 0.44%
• 1M: 0.57%
• YTD: 11.06%
• 6M: 11.82%
• 1Y: 25.83%
• 3Y*: 19.71%
• 5Y*: 10.65%
• 10Y*: 12.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRRCX vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TRRCX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund	6.49%	8.23%	10.73%	16.36%	-16.89%	13.70%	15.90%	22.50%	-6.36%	19.46%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	11.06%	22.43%	16.49%	22.02%	-18.00%	18.27%	16.59%	26.81%	-9.76%	24.50%

Correlation

The correlation between TRRCX and VT is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2008	0.96

The correlation between TRRCX and VT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TRRCX vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRRCX

TRRCX Risk / Return Rank: 20
TRRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
TRRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
TRRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 25
TRRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
TRRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 20

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 68
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 69
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRRCX vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund (TRRCX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TRRCX	VT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.00	1.94	-0.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.33	2.67	-1.34
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	1.35	-0.15
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.25	2.68	-1.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.13	11.67	-7.54

TRRCX vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRRCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is lower than the VT Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRRCX and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TRRCX vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRRCX drawdown since its inception was -52.28%, roughly equal to the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRRCX and VT.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRRCX	VT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.28%	-50.27%	-2.01%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.93%	-9.67%	+1.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-10.46%	-16.51%	+6.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.07%	-26.38%	+2.31%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-28.55%	-34.24%	+5.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.34%	-1.92%	+0.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.07%	-7.01%	+0.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.37%	2.22%	+0.15%

Volatility

TRRCX vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund (TRRCX) is 3.44%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 5.26%. This indicates that TRRCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRRCX	VT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.44%	5.26%	-1.82%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.65%	11.01%	-2.36%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.93%	13.38%	-3.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.40%	16.15%	-4.75%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.26%	17.27%	-5.01%

TRRCX vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRRCX has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than VT's 0.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRRCX vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

TRRCX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
TRRCX T. Rowe Price Retirement 2030 Fund	0.00%	0.00%	3.38%	6.16%	12.05%	9.43%	5.45%	5.44%	8.83%	3.82%	2.66%	3.76%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.61%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRRCX and VT in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, TRRCX and VT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TRRCX or VT?

VT has higher volatility (5.26%) compared to TRRCX (3.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRRCX dropped -52.28% vs VT's -50.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.