PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRMK vs. GKOS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

TRMK vs. GKOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) and Glaukos Corporation (GKOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRMK achieves a 23.21% return, which is significantly lower than GKOS's 47.66% return. Over the past 10 years, TRMK has underperformed GKOS with an annualized return of 9.53%, while GKOS has yielded a comparatively higher 17.16% annualized return.


TRMK

1D
-0.19%
1M
2.31%
6M
12.86%
YTD
23.21%
1Y
32.87%
3Y*
25.50%
5Y*
12.88%
10Y*
9.53%
ALL TIME*
10.35%

GKOS

1D
-1.07%
1M
12.39%
6M
39.65%
YTD
47.66%
1Y
93.50%
3Y*
29.54%
5Y*
26.73%
10Y*
17.16%
ALL TIME*
17.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$174.06M$139.88M$138.83M
$26.79M$22.09M$20.08M

TRMK vs. GKOS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRMK
Trustmark Corporation
23.21%12.99%30.65%-17.02%10.67%22.34%-17.98%24.73%-8.24%-8.04%
GKOS
Glaukos Corporation
47.66%-24.70%88.63%81.98%-1.71%-40.95%38.17%-3.03%118.99%-25.22%

Correlation

The correlation between TRMK and GKOS is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.29

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2015

0.25

Fundamentals

Market Cap

TRMK:

$2.78B

GKOS:

$9.83B

EPS

TRMK:

$3.93

GKOS:

-$3.25

PS Ratio

TRMK:

2.48

GKOS:

15.73

PB Ratio

TRMK:

1.30

GKOS:

14.27

Total Revenue (TTM)

TRMK:

$1.14B

GKOS:

$612.84M

Gross Profit (TTM)

TRMK:

$422.89M

GKOS:

$484.88M

EBITDA (TTM)

TRMK:

$260.89M

GKOS:

-$152.64M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRMK vs. GKOS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TRMK
TRMK Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
TRMK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRMK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRMK Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
TRMK Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRMK Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

GKOS
GKOS Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
GKOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GKOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
GKOS Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
GKOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GKOS Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TRMK vs. GKOS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) and Glaukos Corporation (GKOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRMKGKOSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.33

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.86

3.32

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.84

9.43

-1.59

TRMK vs. GKOS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRMK Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the GKOS Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRMK and GKOS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRMK vs. GKOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRMK drawdown since its inception was -53.55%, smaller than the maximum GKOS drawdown of -69.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRMK and GKOS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRMKGKOSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.55%

-69.57%

+16.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.67%

-28.39%

+17.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.47%

-53.68%

+27.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-47.77%

-53.68%

+5.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.77%

-69.57%

+21.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-1.07%

+0.63%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.71%

-27.54%

+14.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.89%

9.97%

-6.08%

Volatility

TRMK vs. GKOS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Trustmark Corporation (TRMK) is 5.31%, while Glaukos Corporation (GKOS) has a volatility of 11.45%. This indicates that TRMK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GKOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRMKGKOSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.31%

11.45%

-6.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.12%

39.75%

-25.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.04%

53.35%

-30.31%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.98%

49.14%

-20.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.51%

52.42%

-21.91%

Dividends

TRMK vs. GKOS - Dividend Comparison

TRMK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, while GKOS has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GKOS
Glaukos Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRMK
Trustmark Corporation
2.07%2.46%2.60%3.30%2.64%2.83%3.37%2.67%3.24%2.89%2.58%3.99%

Financials

TRMK vs. GKOS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Trustmark Corporation and Glaukos Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


TRMK and GKOS have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GKOS has higher volatility (11.45%) compared to TRMK (5.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRMK dropped -53.55% vs GKOS's -69.57%.

GKOS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRMK and GKOS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer