TRMCX vs. PRDGX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund (TRMCX) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX).
TRMCX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jun 28, 1996. PRDGX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Dec 30, 1992.
Performance
TRMCX vs. PRDGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TRMCX vs. PRDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRMCX T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund | 3.51% | 10.55% | 16.21% | 18.99% | -4.16% | 24.51% | 9.84% | 19.59% | -10.66% | 11.59% |
PRDGX T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. | -0.55% | 14.74% | 13.48% | 13.68% | -10.22% | 26.03% | 13.92% | 31.76% | -1.06% | 18.89% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRMCX achieves a 3.51% return, which is significantly higher than PRDGX's -0.55% return. Over the past 10 years, TRMCX has underperformed PRDGX with an annualized return of 11.17%, while PRDGX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.31% annualized return.
TRMCX
- 1D
- 2.68%
- 1M
- -6.54%
- YTD
- 3.51%
- 6M
- 9.26%
- 1Y
- 17.90%
- 3Y*
- 15.35%
- 5Y*
- 10.24%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
PRDGX
- 1D
- 1.97%
- 1M
- -5.22%
- YTD
- -0.55%
- 6M
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- 11.40%
- 3Y*
- 13.02%
- 5Y*
- 9.49%
- 10Y*
- 12.31%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TRMCX vs. PRDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRMCX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is higher than PRDGX's 0.62% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TRMCX vs. PRDGX — Risk / Return Rank
TRMCX
PRDGX
TRMCX vs. PRDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund (TRMCX) and T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRMCX | PRDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.91 | 0.77 | +0.14 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.38 | 1.17 | +0.21 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.18 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 1.13 | -0.04 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.35 | 5.36 | -1.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRMCX | PRDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 0.77 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.68 | -0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.78 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.65 | -0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between TRMCX and PRDGX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TRMCX vs. PRDGX - Dividend Comparison
TRMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.17%, more than PRDGX's 8.14% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRMCX T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund | 9.17% | 9.49% | 14.20% | 7.65% | 13.92% | 9.22% | 3.79% | 4.25% | 12.13% | 6.58% | 6.74% | 11.39% |
PRDGX T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. | 8.14% | 8.02% | 4.66% | 2.78% | 3.81% | 2.00% | 1.03% | 2.33% | 3.67% | 1.82% | 3.07% | 7.57% |
Drawdowns
TRMCX vs. PRDGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRMCX drawdown since its inception was -55.28%, which is greater than PRDGX's maximum drawdown of -49.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRMCX and PRDGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRMCX | PRDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.28% | -49.79% | -5.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.82% | -11.28% | -3.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.60% | -19.31% | -10.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.41% | -33.18% | -6.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.98% | -5.50% | -1.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.65% | -5.44% | -1.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.71% | 2.37% | +1.34% |
Volatility
TRMCX vs. PRDGX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund (TRMCX) has a higher volatility of 5.95% compared to T. Rowe Price Dividend Growth Fund, Inc. (PRDGX) at 4.13%. This indicates that TRMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TRMCX | PRDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.95% | 4.13% | +1.82% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.05% | 7.61% | +3.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.85% | 15.09% | +4.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 14.08% | +5.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 15.87% | +3.78% |