TRMCX vs. HWMIX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund (TRMCX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX).
TRMCX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Jun 28, 1996. HWMIX is managed by Hotchkis & Wiley. It was launched on Jan 2, 1997.
Performance
TRMCX vs. HWMIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TRMCX vs. HWMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRMCX T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund | 3.51% | 10.55% | 16.21% | 18.99% | -4.16% | 24.51% | 9.84% | 19.59% | -10.66% | 11.59% |
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 6.74% | 7.87% | 3.62% | 19.87% | 1.63% | 39.18% | 0.49% | 12.97% | -19.32% | 7.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRMCX achieves a 3.51% return, which is significantly lower than HWMIX's 6.74% return. Over the past 10 years, TRMCX has outperformed HWMIX with an annualized return of 11.17%, while HWMIX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.08% annualized return.
TRMCX
- 1D
- 2.68%
- 1M
- -6.54%
- YTD
- 3.51%
- 6M
- 9.26%
- 1Y
- 17.90%
- 3Y*
- 15.35%
- 5Y*
- 10.24%
- 10Y*
- 11.17%
HWMIX
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- 6.74%
- 6M
- 8.96%
- 1Y
- 22.13%
- 3Y*
- 12.01%
- 5Y*
- 9.76%
- 10Y*
- 9.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TRMCX vs. HWMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRMCX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than HWMIX's 1.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TRMCX vs. HWMIX — Risk / Return Rank
TRMCX
HWMIX
TRMCX vs. HWMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund (TRMCX) and Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRMCX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.91 | 0.93 | -0.01 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.38 | 1.41 | -0.03 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.21 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.09 | 1.35 | -0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.35 | 5.49 | -1.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRMCX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 | 0.93 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 | 0.44 | +0.10 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | 0.36 | +0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 0.47 | +0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between TRMCX and HWMIX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TRMCX vs. HWMIX - Dividend Comparison
TRMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.17%, more than HWMIX's 1.31% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRMCX T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund | 9.17% | 9.49% | 14.20% | 7.65% | 13.92% | 9.22% | 3.79% | 4.25% | 12.13% | 6.58% | 6.74% | 11.39% |
HWMIX Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund | 1.31% | 1.39% | 1.15% | 0.28% | 0.49% | 1.28% | 2.25% | 1.60% | 2.99% | 6.72% | 1.53% | 14.67% |
Drawdowns
TRMCX vs. HWMIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRMCX drawdown since its inception was -55.28%, smaller than the maximum HWMIX drawdown of -69.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRMCX and HWMIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRMCX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.28% | -69.84% | +14.56% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.82% | -16.87% | +2.05% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.60% | -25.90% | -3.70% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.41% | -63.21% | +23.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.98% | -3.32% | -3.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.65% | -10.89% | +4.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.71% | 4.15% | -0.44% |
Volatility
TRMCX vs. HWMIX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund (TRMCX) has a higher volatility of 5.95% compared to Hotchkis & Wiley Mid-Cap Value Fund (HWMIX) at 4.30%. This indicates that TRMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HWMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TRMCX | HWMIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.95% | 4.30% | +1.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.05% | 12.42% | -1.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.85% | 23.86% | -4.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.30% | 22.34% | -3.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.65% | 25.62% | -5.97% |