TRMCX vs. FVCSX

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

TRMCX (T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund) and FVCSX (Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TRMCX returned 11.56%/yr vs 10.25%/yr for FVCSX. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TRMCX charges 0.87%/yr vs 1.92%/yr for FVCSX.

Performance

TRMCX vs. FVCSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund (TRMCX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C (FVCSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRMCX achieves a 21.17% return, which is significantly lower than FVCSX's 29.67% return. Over the past 10 years, TRMCX has outperformed FVCSX with an annualized return of 11.56%, while FVCSX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.25% annualized return.

TRMCX

• 1D: 0.85%
• 1M: 0.91%
• 6M: 13.81%
• YTD: 21.17%
• 1Y: 29.57%
• 3Y*: 16.56%
• 5Y*: 12.87%
• 10Y*: 11.56%
• ALL TIME*: 11.56%

FVCSX

• 1D: 1.33%
• 1M: 3.11%
• 6M: 17.36%
• YTD: 29.67%
• 1Y: 42.57%
• 3Y*: 11.04%
• 5Y*: 8.94%
• 10Y*: 10.25%
• ALL TIME*: 6.53%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FVCSX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
TRMCX T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

TRMCX vs. FVCSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TRMCX T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund	21.17%	6.16%	16.21%	18.99%	-4.16%	24.51%	9.84%	19.59%	-10.66%	11.59%
FVCSX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C	29.67%	7.23%	-6.69%	19.32%	-8.35%	31.94%	7.10%	33.09%	-17.58%	16.92%

Correlation

The correlation between TRMCX and FVCSX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 1996	0.86

The correlation between TRMCX and FVCSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TRMCX vs. FVCSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TRMCX

TRMCX Risk / Return Rank: 87
TRMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
TRMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
TRMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 81
TRMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
TRMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

FVCSX

FVCSX Risk / Return Rank: 93
FVCSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FVCSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FVCSX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
FVCSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FVCSX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TRMCX vs. FVCSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund (TRMCX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C (FVCSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TRMCX	FVCSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	2.63	-0.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.20	3.70	-0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.45	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.35	4.48	-1.13
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.04	17.27	-4.24

TRMCX vs. FVCSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRMCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the FVCSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRMCX and FVCSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TRMCX vs. FVCSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRMCX drawdown since its inception was -55.28%, smaller than the maximum FVCSX drawdown of -70.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRMCX and FVCSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRMCX	FVCSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.28%	-70.38%	+15.10%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.41%	-9.89%	+0.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.60%	-37.07%	+7.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.60%	-37.07%	+7.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-39.41%	-48.07%	+8.66%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.38%	0.00%	-0.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.61%	-11.13%	+4.52%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.41%	2.56%	-0.15%

Volatility

TRMCX vs. FVCSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund (TRMCX) is 3.15%, while Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C (FVCSX) has a volatility of 3.50%. This indicates that TRMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FVCSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRMCX	FVCSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.15%	3.50%	-0.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.87%	11.75%	-0.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.41%	16.88%	-2.47%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.24%	20.97%	-1.73%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.57%	22.14%	-2.57%

TRMCX vs. FVCSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRMCX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than FVCSX's 1.92% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRMCX vs. FVCSX - Dividend Comparison

TRMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.48%, less than FVCSX's 10.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FVCSX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class C	10.08%	13.08%	0.00%	2.96%	2.23%	9.80%	0.33%	5.50%	18.83%	8.78%	25.66%	0.43%
TRMCX T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund	4.48%	5.43%	14.20%	7.65%	13.92%	9.22%	3.79%	4.25%	12.13%	6.58%	6.74%	11.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRMCX and FVCSX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, TRMCX and FVCSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TRMCX or FVCSX?

FVCSX has higher volatility (3.50%) compared to TRMCX (3.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRMCX dropped -55.28% vs FVCSX's -70.38%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FVCSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.