TRMCX vs. FSOAX
TRMCX (T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund) and FSOAX (Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class A) are both Mid Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TRMCX returned 11.50%/yr vs 9.84%/yr for FSOAX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRMCX charges 0.77%/yr vs 1.13%/yr for FSOAX.
Performance
TRMCX vs. FSOAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRMCX achieves a 19.43% return, which is significantly lower than FSOAX's 26.18% return. Over the past 10 years, TRMCX has outperformed FSOAX with an annualized return of 11.50%, while FSOAX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.84% annualized return.
TRMCX
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 1.35%
- 6M
- 14.24%
- YTD
- 19.43%
- 1Y
- 28.52%
- 3Y*
- 16.49%
- 5Y*
- 12.33%
- 10Y*
- 11.50%
FSOAX
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 1.36%
- 6M
- 17.49%
- YTD
- 26.18%
- 1Y
- 25.77%
- 3Y*
- 9.08%
- 5Y*
- 7.57%
- 10Y*
- 9.84%
TRMCX vs. FSOAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRMCX T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund | 19.43% | 6.16% | 16.21% | 18.99% | -4.16% | 24.51% | 9.84% | 19.59% | -10.66% | 11.59% |
FSOAX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class A | 26.18% | -2.17% | -3.64% | 20.24% | -7.61% | 32.95% | 7.95% | 34.16% | -17.02% | 17.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRMCX and FSOAX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.93 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 28, 1996 | 0.90 |
The correlation between TRMCX and FSOAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRMCX vs. FSOAX — Risk / Return Rank
TRMCX
FSOAX
TRMCX vs. FSOAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund (TRMCX) and Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class A (FSOAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRMCX | FSOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.65 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.23 | +0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.85 | 2.05 | +0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.82 | 7.17 | +3.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRMCX vs. FSOAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRMCX drawdown since its inception was -55.28%, smaller than the maximum FSOAX drawdown of -70.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRMCX and FSOAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRMCX | FSOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.28% | -70.02% | +14.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.41% | -11.56% | +2.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.60% | -35.33% | +5.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.60% | -35.33% | +5.73% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.41% | -47.99% | +8.58% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.60% | -0.39% | -0.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.62% | -9.96% | +3.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.48% | 3.30% | -0.82% |
Volatility
TRMCX vs. FSOAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund (TRMCX) is 3.73%, while Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class A (FSOAX) has a volatility of 4.05%. This indicates that TRMCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FSOAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRMCX | FSOAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.73% | 4.05% | -0.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.96% | 11.96% | -1.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.57% | 19.84% | -5.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.28% | 21.24% | -1.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.57% | 22.23% | -2.66% |
TRMCX vs. FSOAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRMCX has a 0.77% expense ratio, which is lower than FSOAX's 1.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRMCX vs. FSOAX - Dividend Comparison
TRMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, while FSOAX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FSOAX Fidelity Advisor Value Strategies Fund Class A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.90% | 2.43% | 8.70% | 0.82% | 5.59% | 17.03% | 7.64% | 22.64% | 1.10% |
TRMCX T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund | 4.54% | 5.43% | 14.20% | 7.65% | 13.92% | 9.22% | 3.79% | 4.25% | 12.13% | 6.58% | 6.74% | 11.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, TRMCX and FSOAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FSOAX has higher volatility (4.05%) compared to TRMCX (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRMCX dropped -55.28% vs FSOAX's -70.02%.
TRMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.84 vs 1.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRMCX and FSOAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer