TRLVX vs. CFBNX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TRLVX (SEI Institutional Managed Trust Core Fixed Income Fund) and CFBNX (Commerce Bond Fund) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. Over the past 10 years, TRLVX returned 1.53%/yr vs 1.91%/yr for CFBNX. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRLVX charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for CFBNX.

Performance

TRLVX vs. CFBNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SEI Institutional Managed Trust Core Fixed Income Fund (TRLVX) and Commerce Bond Fund (CFBNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRLVX achieves a -0.05% return, which is significantly lower than CFBNX's 0.24% return. Over the past 10 years, TRLVX has underperformed CFBNX with an annualized return of 1.53%, while CFBNX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.91% annualized return.

TRLVX

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 0.01%
• YTD: -0.05%
• 6M: 0.07%
• 1Y: 4.13%
• 3Y*: 3.70%
• 5Y*: -0.61%
• 10Y*: 1.53%

CFBNX

• 1D: -0.17%
• 1M: 0.14%
• YTD: 0.24%
• 6M: 0.33%
• 1Y: 4.65%
• 3Y*: 4.05%
• 5Y*: 0.13%
• 10Y*: 1.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRLVX vs. CFBNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TRLVX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Core Fixed Income Fund	-0.05%	7.06%	0.83%	5.92%	-15.66%	-1.63%	9.04%	9.25%	-0.47%	4.15%
CFBNX Commerce Bond Fund	0.24%	7.12%	1.52%	5.97%	-13.30%	-0.56%	7.15%	8.97%	-0.58%	4.55%

Correlation

The correlation between TRLVX and CFBNX is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.97
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 1994	0.93

The correlation between TRLVX and CFBNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TRLVX vs. CFBNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRLVX

TRLVX Risk / Return Rank: 17
TRLVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
TRLVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
TRLVX Omega Ratio Rank: 16
TRLVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
TRLVX Martin Ratio Rank: 16

CFBNX

CFBNX Risk / Return Rank: 23
CFBNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 24
CFBNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
CFBNX Omega Ratio Rank: 23
CFBNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 24
CFBNX Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRLVX vs. CFBNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SEI Institutional Managed Trust Core Fixed Income Fund (TRLVX) and Commerce Bond Fund (CFBNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRLVX	CFBNX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.17	1.37	-0.21
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	2.05	-0.30
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.24	-0.04
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.46	1.79	-0.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.39	5.25	-0.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRLVX vs. CFBNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRLVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is comparable to the CFBNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRLVX and CFBNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRLVX	CFBNX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.17	1.37	-0.21
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.10	0.02	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.29	0.41	-0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.02	1.07	-0.05

Drawdowns

TRLVX vs. CFBNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRLVX drawdown since its inception was -20.98%, which is greater than CFBNX's maximum drawdown of -17.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRLVX and CFBNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRLVX	CFBNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.98%	-17.90%	-3.08%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.29%	-2.98%	-0.31%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-6.90%	-5.72%	-1.18%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.68%	-17.90%	-2.78%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-20.98%	-17.90%	-3.08%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.18%	-1.64%	-3.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.48%	-2.11%	-0.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.09%	1.01%	+0.08%

Volatility

TRLVX vs. CFBNX - Volatility Comparison

SEI Institutional Managed Trust Core Fixed Income Fund (TRLVX) has a higher volatility of 1.41% compared to Commerce Bond Fund (CFBNX) at 1.26%. This indicates that TRLVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CFBNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRLVX	CFBNX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.41%	1.26%	+0.15%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.97%	2.76%	+0.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.13%	3.88%	+0.25%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	6.38%	5.56%	+0.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.24%	4.70%	+0.54%

TRLVX vs. CFBNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRLVX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than CFBNX's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRLVX vs. CFBNX - Dividend Comparison

TRLVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.67%, more than CFBNX's 3.62% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CFBNX Commerce Bond Fund	3.62%	3.54%	2.94%	2.67%	2.40%	3.02%	2.71%	3.14%	3.25%	3.23%	3.40%	3.52%
TRLVX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Core Fixed Income Fund	3.67%	3.52%	4.01%	3.38%	1.80%	1.90%	5.98%	3.73%	2.77%	2.36%	4.46%	3.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRLVX and CFBNX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, TRLVX and CFBNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TRLVX or CFBNX?

TRLVX has higher volatility (1.41%) compared to CFBNX (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRLVX dropped -20.98% vs CFBNX's -17.90%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CFBNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.