PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRIFX vs. SIFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRIFX vs. SIFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income Fund (TRIFX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRIFX achieves a 5.99% return, which is significantly lower than SIFAX's 8.08% return. Over the past 10 years, TRIFX has outperformed SIFAX with an annualized return of 9.30%, while SIFAX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.55% annualized return.


TRIFX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.25%
YTD
5.99%
6M
4.53%
1Y
19.21%
3Y*
11.77%
5Y*
5.03%
10Y*
9.30%

SIFAX

1D
0.12%
1M
-1.50%
YTD
8.08%
6M
7.70%
1Y
12.43%
3Y*
7.51%
5Y*
5.83%
10Y*
3.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRIFX vs. SIFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRIFX
Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income Fund
5.99%5.53%10.63%14.49%-12.48%24.45%5.12%19.43%-7.19%12.65%
SIFAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund
8.08%7.82%4.08%-1.74%8.48%10.83%-1.59%5.68%-3.64%-1.96%

Correlation

The correlation between TRIFX and SIFAX is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.14

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.28

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2013

0.30

Over the past year, the correlation between TRIFX and SIFAX has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRIFX vs. SIFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRIFX
TRIFX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
TRIFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRIFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRIFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
TRIFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRIFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

SIFAX
SIFAX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
SIFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SIFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRIFX vs. SIFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income Fund (TRIFX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRIFXSIFAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.58

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.44

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.78

5.18

-2.41

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.99

16.54

-9.54

TRIFX vs. SIFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRIFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.73, which is comparable to the SIFAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRIFX and SIFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRIFXSIFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.73

2.31

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

1.05

-0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.68

+0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.16

0.34

-0.18

Drawdowns

TRIFX vs. SIFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRIFX drawdown since its inception was -54.53%, which is greater than SIFAX's maximum drawdown of -23.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRIFX and SIFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRIFXSIFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-54.53%

-23.62%

-30.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.34%

-2.41%

-4.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.67%

-3.57%

-12.10%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.76%

-8.32%

-12.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.43%

-14.69%

-20.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.04%

-1.83%

+0.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.20%

-8.55%

-9.65%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

0.75%

+2.16%

Volatility

TRIFX vs. SIFAX - Volatility Comparison

Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income Fund (TRIFX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund (SIFAX) have volatilities of 2.20% and 2.18%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRIFXSIFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.20%

2.18%

+0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.16%

4.69%

+3.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.81%

5.41%

+6.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.72%

5.60%

+5.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.73%

5.22%

+6.51%

TRIFX vs. SIFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRIFX has a 1.58% expense ratio, which is higher than SIFAX's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRIFX vs. SIFAX - Dividend Comparison

TRIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%, more than SIFAX's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SIFAX
SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Inflation Managed Fund
4.21%4.55%3.25%3.82%11.90%7.89%1.45%1.49%1.90%1.39%1.15%0.48%
TRIFX
Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income Fund
5.91%4.90%7.36%5.42%4.84%5.15%5.44%5.36%7.10%6.47%6.14%10.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRIFX and SIFAX have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRIFX has higher volatility (2.20%) compared to SIFAX (2.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRIFX dropped -54.53% vs SIFAX's -23.62%.

SIFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRIFX and SIFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer