TRIFX vs. MLXIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income Fund (TRIFX) and Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX).
TRIFX is managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. It was launched on May 20, 2008. MLXIX is managed by Catalyst Mutual Funds. It was launched on Dec 21, 2014.
Performance
TRIFX vs. MLXIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TRIFX vs. MLXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRIFX Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income Fund | -2.98% | 5.53% | 10.63% | 14.49% | -12.48% | 24.45% | 5.12% | 19.43% | -7.19% | 12.65% |
MLXIX Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund | 35.24% | -8.56% | 45.26% | 15.34% | 27.02% | 42.04% | -20.02% | 12.05% | -18.48% | -13.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRIFX achieves a -2.98% return, which is significantly lower than MLXIX's 35.24% return. Over the past 10 years, TRIFX has underperformed MLXIX with an annualized return of 8.97%, while MLXIX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.06% annualized return.
TRIFX
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -2.37%
- YTD
- -2.98%
- 6M
- -5.43%
- 1Y
- 6.22%
- 3Y*
- 8.52%
- 5Y*
- 4.54%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
MLXIX
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- 14.05%
- YTD
- 35.24%
- 6M
- 26.46%
- 1Y
- 21.20%
- 3Y*
- 27.68%
- 5Y*
- 25.39%
- 10Y*
- 15.06%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TRIFX vs. MLXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRIFX has a 1.58% expense ratio, which is higher than MLXIX's 1.43% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TRIFX vs. MLXIX — Risk / Return Rank
TRIFX
MLXIX
TRIFX vs. MLXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income Fund (TRIFX) and Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRIFX | MLXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.40 | 0.91 | -0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.62 | 1.26 | -0.64 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.19 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.45 | 1.19 | -0.75 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.27 | 2.36 | -1.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRIFX | MLXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 | 0.91 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.43 | 1.15 | -0.72 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.53 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.12 | 0.22 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between TRIFX and MLXIX is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
TRIFX vs. MLXIX - Dividend Comparison
TRIFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.02%, less than MLXIX's 6.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRIFX Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income Fund | 6.02% | 4.90% | 7.36% | 5.42% | 4.84% | 5.15% | 5.44% | 5.36% | 7.10% | 6.47% | 6.14% | 10.01% |
MLXIX Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund | 6.52% | 8.26% | 5.02% | 6.67% | 7.15% | 8.26% | 14.52% | 15.93% | 15.62% | 11.37% | 8.76% | 11.47% |
Drawdowns
TRIFX vs. MLXIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRIFX drawdown since its inception was -54.53%, smaller than the maximum MLXIX drawdown of -76.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRIFX and MLXIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRIFX | MLXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.53% | -76.78% | +22.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.56% | -16.50% | +5.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.76% | -22.14% | +1.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -35.43% | -72.63% | +37.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.22% | -1.51% | -5.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.36% | -23.47% | +5.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.73% | 8.33% | -4.60% |
Volatility
TRIFX vs. MLXIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Catalyst/SMH Total Return Income Fund (TRIFX) is 3.40%, while Catalyst Energy Infrastructure Fund (MLXIX) has a volatility of 6.04%. This indicates that TRIFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MLXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TRIFX | MLXIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.40% | 6.04% | -2.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.46% | 13.30% | -3.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.35% | 23.26% | -8.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.64% | 22.13% | -11.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.70% | 28.33% | -16.63% |