TRIEX vs. JQC
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen International Equity Index Fund Retirement Class (TRIEX) and Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC).
TRIEX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the MSCI EAFE Index. It was launched on Oct 1, 2002. JQC is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Jun 26, 2003.
Performance
TRIEX vs. JQC - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TRIEX vs. JQC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRIEX Nuveen International Equity Index Fund Retirement Class | 0.98% | 31.24% | 3.41% | 17.93% | -14.44% | 11.08% | 7.85% | 21.58% | -13.56% | 25.06% |
JQC Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund | -0.69% | -0.36% | 22.29% | 15.26% | -14.22% | 13.29% | -2.96% | 21.78% | -4.33% | -0.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRIEX achieves a 0.98% return, which is significantly higher than JQC's -0.69% return. Over the past 10 years, TRIEX has outperformed JQC with an annualized return of 8.63%, while JQC has yielded a comparatively lower 6.15% annualized return.
TRIEX
- 1D
- 2.99%
- 1M
- -6.32%
- YTD
- 0.98%
- 6M
- 4.68%
- 1Y
- 22.55%
- 3Y*
- 14.20%
- 5Y*
- 7.98%
- 10Y*
- 8.63%
JQC
- 1D
- -0.82%
- 1M
- -0.39%
- YTD
- -0.69%
- 6M
- -3.79%
- 1Y
- 2.42%
- 3Y*
- 10.57%
- 5Y*
- 4.84%
- 10Y*
- 6.15%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TRIEX vs. JQC - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRIEX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than JQC's 4.34% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TRIEX vs. JQC — Risk / Return Rank
TRIEX
JQC
TRIEX vs. JQC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen International Equity Index Fund Retirement Class (TRIEX) and Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRIEX | JQC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.34 | 0.16 | +1.19 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.85 | 0.33 | +1.52 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.05 | +0.22 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 0.16 | +1.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.82 | 0.35 | +6.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRIEX | JQC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.34 | 0.16 | +1.19 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.37 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.35 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.40 | 0.23 | +0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between TRIEX and JQC is 0.40, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
TRIEX vs. JQC - Dividend Comparison
TRIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.53%, less than JQC's 13.32% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRIEX Nuveen International Equity Index Fund Retirement Class | 3.53% | 3.57% | 2.84% | 2.83% | 2.49% | 2.69% | 1.70% | 2.78% | 3.05% | 2.51% | 2.65% | 2.72% |
JQC Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund | 13.32% | 12.91% | 11.39% | 11.42% | 9.71% | 10.03% | 16.11% | 16.14% | 6.53% | 7.42% | 6.99% | 7.51% |
Drawdowns
TRIEX vs. JQC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRIEX drawdown since its inception was -60.73%, smaller than the maximum JQC drawdown of -75.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRIEX and JQC.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRIEX | JQC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.73% | -75.18% | +14.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.37% | -10.15% | -1.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.44% | -19.83% | -9.61% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.96% | -47.99% | +14.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.22% | -6.67% | -1.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.50% | -8.84% | -2.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 4.67% | -1.66% |
Volatility
TRIEX vs. JQC - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen International Equity Index Fund Retirement Class (TRIEX) has a higher volatility of 7.74% compared to Nuveen Credit Strategies Income Fund (JQC) at 6.02%. This indicates that TRIEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JQC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TRIEX | JQC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.74% | 6.02% | +1.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.21% | 9.36% | +1.85% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.17% | 15.57% | +1.60% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.94% | 13.12% | +2.82% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.59% | 17.56% | -0.97% |