PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRIEX vs. GOIGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRIEX vs. GOIGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen International Equity Index Fund Retirement Class (TRIEX) and John Hancock International Growth Fund Class A (GOIGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRIEX achieves a 9.05% return, which is significantly lower than GOIGX's 13.73% return. Over the past 10 years, TRIEX has underperformed GOIGX with an annualized return of 9.08%, while GOIGX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.89% annualized return.


TRIEX

1D
-0.26%
1M
2.56%
YTD
9.05%
6M
11.95%
1Y
20.55%
3Y*
16.65%
5Y*
8.37%
10Y*
9.08%

GOIGX

1D
0.08%
1M
4.87%
YTD
13.73%
6M
16.03%
1Y
26.03%
3Y*
19.31%
5Y*
5.64%
10Y*
9.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRIEX vs. GOIGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRIEX
Nuveen International Equity Index Fund Retirement Class
9.05%31.24%3.41%17.93%-14.44%11.08%7.85%21.58%-13.56%25.06%
GOIGX
John Hancock International Growth Fund Class A
13.73%29.39%10.41%12.55%-27.00%9.33%22.08%27.45%-12.31%36.25%

Correlation

The correlation between TRIEX and GOIGX is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2007

0.92

The correlation between TRIEX and GOIGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRIEX vs. GOIGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRIEX
TRIEX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
TRIEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRIEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRIEX Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
TRIEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRIEX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

GOIGX
GOIGX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
GOIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
GOIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRIEX vs. GOIGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen International Equity Index Fund Retirement Class (TRIEX) and John Hancock International Growth Fund Class A (GOIGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRIEXGOIGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.46

1.57

-0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.09

2.24

-0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.29

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

1.94

+0.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.51

8.00

-0.48

TRIEX vs. GOIGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRIEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the GOIGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.57. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRIEX and GOIGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRIEXGOIGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

1.57

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

0.33

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

0.58

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.36

+0.05

Drawdowns

TRIEX vs. GOIGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRIEX drawdown since its inception was -60.73%, which is greater than GOIGX's maximum drawdown of -54.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRIEX and GOIGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRIEXGOIGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.73%

-54.60%

-6.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.37%

-13.75%

+2.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.55%

-13.75%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.44%

-38.46%

+9.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.96%

-38.46%

+4.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.89%

-0.18%

-0.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.44%

-12.63%

+1.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.04%

3.34%

-0.30%

Volatility

TRIEX vs. GOIGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Nuveen International Equity Index Fund Retirement Class (TRIEX) is 4.73%, while John Hancock International Growth Fund Class A (GOIGX) has a volatility of 6.60%. This indicates that TRIEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GOIGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRIEXGOIGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

6.60%

-1.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.33%

14.95%

-2.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.17%

17.39%

-2.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.10%

16.95%

-0.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.65%

17.06%

-0.41%

TRIEX vs. GOIGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRIEX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than GOIGX's 1.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRIEX vs. GOIGX - Dividend Comparison

TRIEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.27%, while GOIGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GOIGX
John Hancock International Growth Fund Class A
0.00%0.00%0.48%2.39%13.77%15.05%0.00%0.40%2.58%0.23%0.62%0.14%
TRIEX
Nuveen International Equity Index Fund Retirement Class
3.27%3.57%2.84%2.83%2.49%2.69%1.70%2.78%3.05%2.51%2.65%2.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRIEX and GOIGX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GOIGX has higher volatility (6.60%) compared to TRIEX (4.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRIEX dropped -60.73% vs GOIGX's -54.60%.

GOIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRIEX and GOIGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer