GOIGX vs. TAGRX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GOIGX (John Hancock International Growth Fund Class A) and TAGRX (John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund) are both mutual funds - GOIGX is a International Equity fund actively managed by John Hancock, while TAGRX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by John Hancock. Over the past 10 years, GOIGX returned 10.82%/yr vs 12.68%/yr for TAGRX. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GOIGX charges 1.30%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for TAGRX.

Performance

GOIGX vs. TAGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock International Growth Fund Class A (GOIGX) and John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GOIGX achieves a 17.20% return, which is significantly higher than TAGRX's -0.63% return. Over the past 10 years, GOIGX has underperformed TAGRX with an annualized return of 10.82%, while TAGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.68% annualized return.

GOIGX

• 1D: 0.57%
• 1M: 5.94%
• YTD: 17.20%
• 6M: 17.07%
• 1Y: 30.30%
• 3Y*: 20.56%
• 5Y*: 6.54%
• 10Y*: 10.82%

TAGRX

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: -2.35%
• YTD: -0.63%
• 6M: -0.97%
• 1Y: 10.85%
• 3Y*: 14.31%
• 5Y*: 7.52%
• 10Y*: 12.68%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GOIGX vs. TAGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GOIGX John Hancock International Growth Fund Class A	17.20%	29.39%	10.41%	12.55%	-27.00%	9.33%	22.08%	27.45%	-12.31%	36.25%
TAGRX John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund	-0.63%	9.98%	21.14%	32.23%	-24.86%	29.16%	20.55%	35.06%	-14.09%	19.63%

Correlation

The correlation between GOIGX and TAGRX is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2007	0.77

The correlation between GOIGX and TAGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GOIGX vs. TAGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GOIGX

GOIGX Risk / Return Rank: 40
GOIGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
GOIGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
GOIGX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
GOIGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
GOIGX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

TAGRX

TAGRX Risk / Return Rank: 11
TAGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
TAGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
TAGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
TAGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
TAGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GOIGX vs. TAGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock International Growth Fund Class A (GOIGX) and John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GOIGX	TAGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.65	0.87	+0.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.29	1.24	+1.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	1.16	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.26	0.82	+1.44
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.17	2.82	+6.35

GOIGX vs. TAGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GOIGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.65, which is higher than the TAGRX Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GOIGX and TAGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GOIGX vs. TAGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GOIGX drawdown since its inception was -54.60%, smaller than the maximum TAGRX drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOIGX and TAGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GOIGX	TAGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-54.60%	-58.45%	+3.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.75%	-14.04%	+0.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.75%	-26.11%	+12.36%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.46%	-29.10%	-9.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.46%	-36.96%	-1.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-4.57%	+4.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.60%	-11.53%	-1.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.38%	4.06%	-0.68%

Volatility

GOIGX vs. TAGRX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock International Growth Fund Class A (GOIGX) has a higher volatility of 8.36% compared to John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX) at 5.04%. This indicates that GOIGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TAGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GOIGX	TAGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.36%	5.04%	+3.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.77%	10.46%	+6.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.91%	13.22%	+5.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.29%	20.27%	-2.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.19%	20.54%	-3.35%

GOIGX vs. TAGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GOIGX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than TAGRX's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

GOIGX vs. TAGRX - Dividend Comparison

GOIGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TAGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.17%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GOIGX John Hancock International Growth Fund Class A	0.00%	0.00%	0.48%	2.39%	13.77%	15.05%	0.00%	0.40%	2.58%	0.23%	0.62%	0.14%
TAGRX John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund	12.17%	12.09%	13.00%	6.67%	6.76%	7.82%	0.30%	0.53%	14.05%	8.22%	2.96%	1.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GOIGX and TAGRX in my portfolio?

GOIGX and TAGRX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GOIGX or TAGRX?

GOIGX has higher volatility (8.36%) compared to TAGRX (5.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GOIGX dropped -54.60% vs TAGRX's -58.45%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GOIGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.