GOIGX vs. GSIYX
Compare and contrast key facts about John Hancock International Growth Fund Class A (GOIGX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6 (GSIYX).
GOIGX is an actively managed fund by John Hancock. It was launched on Jun 12, 2006. GSIYX is a passively managed fund by Goldman Sachs that tracks the performance of the MSCI AC World ex USA Growth (Net). It was launched on Dec 15, 2016.
Performance
GOIGX vs. GSIYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GOIGX vs. GSIYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOIGX John Hancock International Growth Fund Class A | -2.15% | 29.39% | 10.41% | 12.55% | -27.00% | 9.33% | 22.08% | 27.45% | -12.31% | 35.72% |
GSIYX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6 | 4.76% | 20.89% | 9.69% | 22.07% | -10.99% | 12.47% | 15.86% | 27.59% | -6.02% | 29.91% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GOIGX achieves a -2.15% return, which is significantly lower than GSIYX's 4.76% return.
GOIGX
- 1D
- 3.62%
- 1M
- -8.12%
- YTD
- -2.15%
- 6M
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- 20.30%
- 3Y*
- 13.67%
- 5Y*
- 3.60%
- 10Y*
- 8.58%
GSIYX
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- -3.92%
- YTD
- 4.76%
- 6M
- 8.21%
- 1Y
- 16.63%
- 3Y*
- 17.78%
- 5Y*
- 10.42%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GOIGX vs. GSIYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GOIGX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than GSIYX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GOIGX vs. GSIYX — Risk / Return Rank
GOIGX
GSIYX
GOIGX vs. GSIYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock International Growth Fund Class A (GOIGX) and Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6 (GSIYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GOIGX | GSIYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.16 | 1.37 | -0.21 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.64 | 1.81 | -0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.29 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.45 | 1.89 | -0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.14 | 7.61 | -1.47 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GOIGX | GSIYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.16 | 1.37 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.22 | 0.73 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.51 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.32 | 0.82 | -0.50 |
Correlation
The correlation between GOIGX and GSIYX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
GOIGX vs. GSIYX - Dividend Comparison
GOIGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while GSIYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GOIGX John Hancock International Growth Fund Class A | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.48% | 2.39% | 13.77% | 15.05% | 0.00% | 0.40% | 2.58% | 0.23% | 0.62% | 0.14% |
GSIYX Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6 | 4.91% | 5.14% | 11.21% | 2.38% | 4.91% | 2.25% | 0.19% | 0.67% | 0.55% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
GOIGX vs. GSIYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GOIGX drawdown since its inception was -54.60%, which is greater than GSIYX's maximum drawdown of -28.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GOIGX and GSIYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GOIGX | GSIYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.60% | -28.79% | -25.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.75% | -8.76% | -4.99% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.46% | -25.36% | -13.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.62% | -5.24% | -5.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.72% | -4.84% | -7.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.25% | 2.17% | +1.08% |
Volatility
GOIGX vs. GSIYX - Volatility Comparison
John Hancock International Growth Fund Class A (GOIGX) has a higher volatility of 9.02% compared to Goldman Sachs GQG Partners International Opportunities Fund Class R6 (GSIYX) at 4.84%. This indicates that GOIGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GSIYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GOIGX | GSIYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.02% | 4.84% | +4.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.07% | 7.41% | +5.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.03% | 12.52% | +5.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.63% | 14.45% | +2.18% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.84% | 15.78% | +1.06% |