PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRIA.L vs. IB01.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRIA.L vs. IB01.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF (TRIA.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TRIA.L having a 1.88% return and IB01.L slightly lower at 1.83%.


TRIA.L

1D
0.05%
1M
0.34%
6M
1.77%
YTD
1.88%
1Y
4.06%
3Y*
4.67%
5Y*
3.35%
10Y*

IB01.L

1D
0.00%
1M
0.27%
6M
1.77%
YTD
1.83%
1Y
3.90%
3Y*
4.66%
5Y*
3.29%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRIA.L vs. IB01.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TRIA.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF
1.88%4.33%5.17%4.97%0.53%-0.00%1.10%
IB01.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc)
1.83%4.34%5.25%4.92%1.08%-0.85%0.82%

Correlation

The correlation between TRIA.L and IB01.L is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2020

0.37

The correlation between TRIA.L and IB01.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (1 year) to 0.40 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRIA.L vs. IB01.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRIA.L
TRIA.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
TRIA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRIA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRIA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
TRIA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRIA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

IB01.L
IB01.L Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
IB01.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IB01.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
IB01.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
IB01.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
IB01.L Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRIA.L vs. IB01.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF (TRIA.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRIA.LIB01.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-9.94

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-34.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.44

8.35

-5.91

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.28

114.58

-111.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.26

560.87

-551.61

TRIA.L vs. IB01.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRIA.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is lower than the IB01.L Sharpe Ratio of 11.93. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRIA.L and IB01.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRIA.L vs. IB01.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRIA.L drawdown since its inception was -1.22%, roughly equal to the maximum IB01.L drawdown of -1.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRIA.L and IB01.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRIA.LIB01.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.22%

-1.28%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.22%

-0.03%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.22%

-0.09%

-1.13%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.22%

-1.12%

-0.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.09%

-0.23%

+0.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.43%

0.01%

+0.42%

Volatility

TRIA.L vs. IB01.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF (TRIA.L) has a higher volatility of 0.13% compared to iShares USD Treasury Bond 0-1yr UCITS ETF (Acc) (IB01.L) at 0.08%. This indicates that TRIA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IB01.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRIA.LIB01.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.13%

0.08%

+0.05%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.99%

0.22%

+1.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.01%

0.33%

+1.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.01%

0.54%

+0.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.93%

0.78%

+0.15%

TRIA.L vs. IB01.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRIA.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IB01.L's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TRIA.L vs. IB01.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither TRIA.L nor IB01.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


TRIA.L and IB01.L have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TRIA.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRIA.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IB01.L.

TRIA.L tracks Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF, while IB01.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Short Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for TRIA.L and 0.07% for IB01.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRIA.L and IB01.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer