TRGP vs. HACBY
TRGP (Targa Resources Corp.) and HACBY (Hachijuni Bank Ltd ADR) are both stocks. TRGP operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy), while HACBY operates in Banks - Regional (Financial Services). Over the past 10 years, TRGP returned 26.71%/yr vs -3.47%/yr for HACBY. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TRGP vs. HACBY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRGP achieves a 49.23% return, which is significantly higher than HACBY's 23.35% return. Over the past 10 years, TRGP has outperformed HACBY with an annualized return of 26.71%, while HACBY has yielded a comparatively lower -3.47% annualized return.
TRGP
- 1D
- 1.20%
- 1M
- 3.54%
- YTD
- 49.23%
- 6M
- 50.30%
- 1Y
- 64.85%
- 3Y*
- 60.15%
- 5Y*
- 45.14%
- 10Y*
- 26.71%
HACBY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- 23.35%
- 6M
- 23.35%
- 1Y
- 68.19%
- 3Y*
- -12.69%
- 5Y*
- -4.31%
- 10Y*
- -3.47%
TRGP vs. HACBY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRGP Targa Resources Corp. | 49.23% | 5.65% | 110.12% | 21.01% | 43.71% | 100.15% | -32.48% | 23.98% | -19.88% | -7.09% |
HACBY Hachijuni Bank Ltd ADR | 23.35% | 91.80% | -77.26% | 32.97% | 24.57% | -3.28% | -22.69% | 7.06% | -29.46% | -0.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRGP and HACBY is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016 | 0.06 |
Fundamentals
TRGP:
$13.11
HACBY:
¥283.66
TRGP:
20.79
HACBY:
15.37
TRGP:
0.23
HACBY:
0.49
TRGP:
2.70
HACBY:
3.33
TRGP:
$16.38B
HACBY:
¥299.73B
TRGP:
$3.62B
HACBY:
¥244.80B
TRGP:
$4.49B
HACBY:
¥80.85B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRGP vs. HACBY — Risk / Return Rank
TRGP
HACBY
TRGP vs. HACBY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP) and Hachijuni Bank Ltd ADR (HACBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRGP | HACBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.79 | -0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.00 | 4.40 | -0.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.02 | 11.33 | +1.69 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRGP vs. HACBY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRGP drawdown since its inception was -95.21%, which is greater than HACBY's maximum drawdown of -85.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRGP and HACBY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRGP | HACBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.21% | -85.63% | -9.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.30% | -15.59% | -0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -31.61% | -85.52% | +53.91% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.61% | -85.52% | +53.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.78% | -85.63% | -5.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.50% | -61.26% | +59.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.55% | -41.02% | +7.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.00% | 6.04% | -1.04% |
Volatility
TRGP vs. HACBY - Volatility Comparison
Targa Resources Corp. (TRGP) has a higher volatility of 7.77% compared to Hachijuni Bank Ltd ADR (HACBY) at 0.67%. This indicates that TRGP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HACBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRGP | HACBY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.77% | 0.67% | +7.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.59% | 19.06% | -0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.29% | 61.60% | -34.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.90% | 64.37% | -32.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.62% | 52.62% | -5.00% |
Dividends
TRGP vs. HACBY - Dividend Comparison
TRGP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, more than HACBY's 0.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HACBY Hachijuni Bank Ltd ADR | 0.94% | 2.95% | 7.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.26% | 2.44% | 0.00% |
TRGP Targa Resources Corp. | 1.56% | 2.03% | 1.54% | 2.13% | 1.90% | 0.77% | 4.59% | 8.92% | 10.11% | 7.52% | 6.49% | 12.53% |
Financials
TRGP vs. HACBY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Targa Resources Corp. and Hachijuni Bank Ltd ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
TRGP vs. HACBY - Profitability Comparison
TRGP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Targa Resources Corp. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 4.09B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
HACBY - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hachijuni Bank Ltd ADR reported a gross profit of 83.20B and revenue of 97.90B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 85.0%.
TRGP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Targa Resources Corp. reported an operating income of 846.90M and revenue of 4.09B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.7%.
HACBY - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hachijuni Bank Ltd ADR reported an operating income of 12.70B and revenue of 97.90B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.0%.
TRGP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Targa Resources Corp. reported a net income of 479.60M and revenue of 4.09B, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.
HACBY - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Hachijuni Bank Ltd ADR reported a net income of 17.17B and revenue of 97.90B, resulting in a net margin of 17.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
TRGP and HACBY have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TRGP has higher volatility (7.77%) compared to HACBY (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRGP dropped -95.21% vs HACBY's -85.63%.
TRGP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRGP and HACBY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer