TRFK vs. WNTR

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

TRFK (Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF) and WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TRFK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net, while WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax. TRFK is passively managed, while WNTR is actively managed. Over the past year, TRFK returned 83.88% vs 115.98% for WNTR. At a correlation of -0.44, they often move in opposite directions. TRFK charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for WNTR.

Performance

TRFK vs. WNTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRFK achieves a 65.49% return, which is significantly higher than WNTR's 17.65% return.

TRFK

• 1D: 3.53%
• 1M: 7.45%
• YTD: 65.49%
• 6M: 63.54%
• 1Y: 83.88%
• 3Y*: 52.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WNTR

• 1D: 6.51%
• 1M: 45.64%
• YTD: 17.65%
• 6M: 21.49%
• 1Y: 115.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRFK vs. WNTR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF	65.49%	36.55%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	17.65%	52.78%

Correlation

The correlation between TRFK and WNTR is -0.43, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.43
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.44

Return for Risk

TRFK vs. WNTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRFK

TRFK Risk / Return Rank: 80
TRFK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
TRFK Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
TRFK Omega Ratio Rank: 80
TRFK Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
TRFK Martin Ratio Rank: 64

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 63
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 64
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRFK vs. WNTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TRFK	WNTR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.63	2.20	+0.43
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.10	2.46	+0.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.33	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.31	2.73	+1.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.10	6.99	+3.11

TRFK vs. WNTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRFK Sharpe Ratio is 2.63, which is comparable to the WNTR Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRFK and WNTR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TRFK vs. WNTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRFK drawdown since its inception was -29.06%, smaller than the maximum WNTR drawdown of -42.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRFK and WNTR.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRFK	WNTR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.06%	-42.65%	+13.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.56%	-42.65%	+23.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-29.06%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.64%	-4.02%	-0.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.04%	-20.87%	+14.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.34%	16.66%	-8.32%

Volatility

TRFK vs. WNTR - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) and YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) have volatilities of 18.23% and 18.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRFK	WNTR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.23%	18.14%	+0.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.59%	46.41%	-19.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.09%	53.16%	-21.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.86%	53.31%	-23.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.86%	53.31%	-23.45%

TRFK vs. WNTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRFK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than WNTR's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRFK vs. WNTR - Dividend Comparison

TRFK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than WNTR's 94.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF	0.01%	0.01%	0.40%	0.20%	0.56%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	94.34%	58.56%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRFK and WNTR in my portfolio?

TRFK and WNTR have a correlation of -0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TRFK or WNTR?

TRFK has higher volatility (18.23%) compared to WNTR (18.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRFK dropped -29.06% vs WNTR's -42.65%.

Which ETF is better, TRFK or WNTR?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 115.98% vs 83.88% for TRFK. On fees, TRFK is cheaper at 0.60% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TRFK or WNTR?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 115.98% return vs 83.88%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TRFK or WNTR?

TRFK is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TRFK or WNTR?

WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 94.34%, compared with 0.01% for TRFK.

What is the main difference between TRFK and WNTR?

TRFK is categorized as Technology Equities, while WNTR is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for TRFK and 1.01% for WNTR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TRFK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.63 vs 2.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.