PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRFK vs. TINY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TRFK vs. TINY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) and ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TRFK vs. TINY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TRFK
Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF
0.21%26.81%38.30%66.63%-10.61%
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
17.55%19.98%6.63%47.97%-12.11%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRFK achieves a 0.21% return, which is significantly lower than TINY's 17.55% return.


TRFK

1D
1.08%
1M
3.96%
YTD
0.21%
6M
-6.67%
1Y
40.83%
3Y*
34.15%
5Y*
10Y*

TINY

1D
-0.62%
1M
-2.72%
YTD
17.55%
6M
17.85%
1Y
64.73%
3Y*
22.04%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TRFK vs. TINY - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRFK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than TINY's 0.58% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TRFK vs. TINY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRFK
TRFK Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TRFK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRFK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRFK Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
TRFK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRFK Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank

TINY
TINY Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
TINY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TINY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
TINY Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
TINY Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
TINY Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRFK vs. TINY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) and ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRFKTINYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.30

1.83

-0.52

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.94

2.48

-0.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.32

-0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

3.97

-1.78

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.20

13.22

-8.02

TRFK vs. TINY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRFK Sharpe Ratio is 1.30, which is comparable to the TINY Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRFK and TINY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRFKTINYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.30

1.83

-0.52

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.01

0.35

+0.66

Correlation

The correlation between TRFK and TINY is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TRFK vs. TINY - Dividend Comparison

TRFK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than TINY's 0.25% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
TRFK
Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF
0.01%0.01%0.40%0.20%0.56%0.00%
TINY
ProShares Nanotechnology ETF
0.25%0.29%0.01%0.35%0.42%0.07%

Drawdowns

TRFK vs. TINY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRFK drawdown since its inception was -29.06%, smaller than the maximum TINY drawdown of -43.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRFK and TINY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TRFKTINYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.06%

-43.79%

+14.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.56%

-16.75%

-2.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.12%

-10.71%

-2.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.22%

-16.67%

+10.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.25%

5.03%

+3.22%

Volatility

TRFK vs. TINY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) is 9.60%, while ProShares Nanotechnology ETF (TINY) has a volatility of 13.32%. This indicates that TRFK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TINY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TRFKTINYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.60%

13.32%

-3.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.51%

24.85%

-4.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.56%

35.66%

-4.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.62%

32.07%

-3.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.62%

32.07%

-3.45%