TRFK vs. PTNQ
TRFK (Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF) and PTNQ (Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TRFK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net, while PTNQ is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TRFK returned 45.78%/yr vs 13.29%/yr for PTNQ. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. TRFK charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for PTNQ.
Performance
TRFK vs. PTNQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRFK achieves a 50.94% return, which is significantly higher than PTNQ's 10.91% return.
TRFK
- 1D
- 6.17%
- 1M
- 0.07%
- 6M
- 50.19%
- YTD
- 50.94%
- 1Y
- 56.27%
- 3Y*
- 45.78%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 39.14%
PTNQ
- 1D
- 3.35%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 10.62%
- YTD
- 10.91%
- 1Y
- 20.79%
- 3Y*
- 13.29%
- 5Y*
- 10.06%
- 10Y*
- 15.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.61%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $3.31M | $2.66M | $2.83M | |
| $17.63M | $18.35M | $19.68M |
TRFK vs. PTNQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF | 50.94% | 26.81% | 38.30% | 66.63% | -10.61% |
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF | 10.91% | 7.18% | 15.47% | 34.65% | -5.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRFK and PTNQ is 0.86, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.86 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 9, 2022 | 0.85 |
The correlation between TRFK and PTNQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRFK vs. PTNQ — Risk / Return Rank
TRFK
PTNQ
TRFK vs. PTNQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) and Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TRFK | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.20 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | 1.78 | +0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.80 | 5.15 | +0.65 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TRFK vs. PTNQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRFK drawdown since its inception was -29.06%, roughly equal to the maximum PTNQ drawdown of -28.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRFK and PTNQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRFK | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.06% | -28.07% | -0.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -26.17% | -11.76% | -14.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.06% | -14.19% | -14.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -18.47% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.03% | -2.99% | -10.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.26% | -5.67% | -0.59% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.74% | 4.05% | +5.69% |
Volatility
TRFK vs. PTNQ - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) has a higher volatility of 17.38% compared to Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF (PTNQ) at 7.65%. This indicates that TRFK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PTNQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRFK | PTNQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.38% | 7.65% | +9.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.56% | 15.52% | +17.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 37.23% | 18.94% | +18.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.03% | 13.88% | +17.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.03% | 16.66% | +14.37% |
TRFK vs. PTNQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRFK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than PTNQ's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRFK vs. PTNQ - Dividend Comparison
TRFK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than PTNQ's 0.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PTNQ Pacer Trendpilot 100 ETF | 0.79% | 0.88% | 1.96% | 1.47% | 0.62% | 0.00% | 0.16% | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.32% | 0.30% | 0.22% |
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 0.20% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRFK and PTNQ have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TRFK has higher volatility (17.38%) compared to PTNQ (7.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRFK dropped -29.06% vs PTNQ's -28.07%.
On 3-year performance, TRFK leads with 45.78% vs 13.29% for PTNQ. On fees, TRFK is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PTNQ has been the lower-risk option at 7.65%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TRFK has performed better with a 45.78% return vs 13.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TRFK is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PTNQ.
PTNQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.79%, compared with 0.01% for TRFK.
TRFK is categorized as Technology Equities, while PTNQ is Large Cap Blend Equities. TRFK tracks Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net, while PTNQ tracks Pacer NASDAQ-100 Trendpilot Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for TRFK and 0.65% for PTNQ.
TRFK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRFK and PTNQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer