TRFK vs. NXTG
TRFK (Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF) and NXTG (First Trust IndXX NextG ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - TRFK tracks the Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net while NXTG tracks the Indxx 5G & NextG Thematic Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TRFK returned 52.66%/yr vs 35.00%/yr for NXTG. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRFK charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for NXTG.
Performance
TRFK vs. NXTG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRFK achieves a 64.96% return, which is significantly higher than NXTG's 51.79% return.
TRFK
- 1D
- -2.93%
- 1M
- 24.68%
- YTD
- 64.96%
- 6M
- 57.34%
- 1Y
- 97.75%
- 3Y*
- 52.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NXTG
- 1D
- -1.78%
- 1M
- 17.41%
- YTD
- 51.79%
- 6M
- 52.46%
- 1Y
- 78.10%
- 3Y*
- 35.00%
- 5Y*
- 18.74%
- 10Y*
- 17.57%
TRFK vs. NXTG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF | 64.96% | 26.81% | 38.30% | 66.63% | -10.61% |
NXTG First Trust IndXX NextG ETF | 51.79% | 28.46% | 12.85% | 28.74% | -9.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRFK and NXTG is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2022 | 0.81 |
The correlation between TRFK and NXTG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
TRFK vs. NXTG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TRFK
NXTG
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
TRFK
NXTG
Industrials
TRFK
NXTG
Basic Materials
TRFK
-
NXTG
-
Communication Services
TRFK
-
NXTG
Consumer Cyclical
TRFK
-
NXTG
Consumer Defensive
TRFK
-
NXTG
-
Energy
TRFK
-
NXTG
-
Financial Services
TRFK
-
NXTG
-
Healthcare
TRFK
-
NXTG
-
Real Estate
TRFK
-
NXTG
Utilities
TRFK
-
NXTG
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRFK vs. NXTG — Risk / Return Rank
TRFK
NXTG
TRFK vs. NXTG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) and First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRFK | NXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.73 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.03 | 7.64 | -2.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.06 | 29.86 | -17.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRFK | NXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.53 | 4.24 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.54 | 0.68 | +0.86 |
Drawdowns
TRFK vs. NXTG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRFK drawdown since its inception was -29.06%, smaller than the maximum NXTG drawdown of -33.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRFK and NXTG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRFK | NXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.06% | -33.61% | +4.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.56% | -10.28% | -9.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -29.06% | -17.75% | -11.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.99% | -2.59% | -0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.04% | -7.87% | +1.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.13% | 2.62% | +5.51% |
Volatility
TRFK vs. NXTG - Volatility Comparison
Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) has a higher volatility of 10.70% compared to First Trust IndXX NextG ETF (NXTG) at 8.51%. This indicates that TRFK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NXTG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRFK | NXTG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.70% | 8.51% | +2.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.98% | 15.41% | +6.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.82% | 18.54% | +9.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.94% | 17.94% | +11.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 28.94% | 18.88% | +10.06% |
TRFK vs. NXTG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRFK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than NXTG's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRFK vs. NXTG - Dividend Comparison
TRFK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than NXTG's 1.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NXTG First Trust IndXX NextG ETF | 1.13% | 1.56% | 1.51% | 2.15% | 2.04% | 1.97% | 1.04% | 0.77% | 1.27% | 1.65% | 1.23% | 1.11% |
TRFK Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.40% | 0.20% | 0.56% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRFK and NXTG have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TRFK has higher volatility (10.70%) compared to NXTG (8.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRFK dropped -29.06% vs NXTG's -33.61%.
On 3-year performance, TRFK leads with 52.66% vs 35.00% for NXTG. On fees, TRFK is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, NXTG has been the lower-risk option at 8.51%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TRFK has performed better with a 52.66% return vs 35.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TRFK is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for NXTG.
NXTG has the higher dividend yield at 1.13%, compared with 0.01% for TRFK.
TRFK tracks Pacer Data Transmission and Communication Revolution Index - Benchmark TR Net, while NXTG tracks Indxx 5G & NextG Thematic Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for TRFK and 0.70% for NXTG.
NXTG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.24 vs 3.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TRFK and NXTG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer