PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRFK vs. COWG
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TRFK vs. COWG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TRFK vs. COWG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TRFK
Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF
-0.86%26.81%38.30%66.63%0.25%
COWG
Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
-3.92%10.24%34.99%20.69%-0.68%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRFK achieves a -0.86% return, which is significantly higher than COWG's -3.92% return.


TRFK

1D
2.04%
1M
0.36%
YTD
-0.86%
6M
-7.06%
1Y
41.36%
3Y*
33.58%
5Y*
10Y*

COWG

1D
0.24%
1M
-4.35%
YTD
-3.92%
6M
-7.05%
1Y
9.21%
3Y*
18.49%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TRFK vs. COWG - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRFK has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than COWG's 0.49% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TRFK vs. COWG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRFK
TRFK Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
TRFK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRFK Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRFK Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
TRFK Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRFK Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

COWG
COWG Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
COWG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COWG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
COWG Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
COWG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3131
Calmar Ratio Rank
COWG Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRFK vs. COWG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) and Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRFKCOWGDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.32

0.41

+0.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.95

0.74

+1.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

1.10

+0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

0.79

+1.40

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.21

2.55

+2.66

TRFK vs. COWG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRFK Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is higher than the COWG Sharpe Ratio of 0.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRFK and COWG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRFKCOWGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.32

0.41

+0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

0.93

+0.06

Correlation

The correlation between TRFK and COWG is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TRFK vs. COWG - Dividend Comparison

TRFK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than COWG's 0.35% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
TRFK
Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF
0.01%0.01%0.40%0.20%0.56%
COWG
Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF
0.35%0.32%0.40%0.47%0.00%

Drawdowns

TRFK vs. COWG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRFK drawdown since its inception was -29.06%, which is greater than COWG's maximum drawdown of -23.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRFK and COWG.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TRFKCOWGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.06%

-23.60%

-5.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.56%

-12.96%

-6.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-14.05%

-7.98%

-6.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.21%

-3.36%

-2.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.21%

4.00%

+4.21%

Volatility

TRFK vs. COWG - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Data and Digital Revolution ETF (TRFK) has a higher volatility of 9.87% compared to Pacer US Large Cap Cash Cows Growth Leaders ETF (COWG) at 5.87%. This indicates that TRFK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COWG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TRFKCOWGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.87%

5.87%

+4.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.60%

13.24%

+7.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.56%

22.50%

+9.06%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.63%

19.32%

+9.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.63%

19.32%

+9.31%