PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TREX.L vs. VCIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TREX.L vs. VCIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TREX.L) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TREX.L achieves a -0.74% return, which is significantly lower than VCIT's 0.41% return.


TREX.L

1D
0.40%
1M
0.12%
YTD
-0.74%
6M
-0.02%
1Y
4.21%
3Y*
2.99%
5Y*
-1.05%
10Y*

VCIT

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.40%
YTD
0.41%
6M
0.89%
1Y
6.00%
3Y*
6.37%
5Y*
1.11%
10Y*
2.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TREX.L vs. VCIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TREX.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF Dist
-0.74%8.41%-0.22%3.58%-14.94%-3.02%9.76%8.50%
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
0.41%9.34%3.20%8.98%-13.98%-1.77%9.46%13.76%

Correlation

The correlation between TREX.L and VCIT is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2019

0.65

The correlation between TREX.L and VCIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TREX.L vs. VCIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TREX.L
TREX.L Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
TREX.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TREX.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
TREX.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
TREX.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
TREX.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

VCIT
VCIT Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
VCIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VCIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
VCIT Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
VCIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
VCIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TREX.L vs. VCIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TREX.L) and Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TREX.LVCITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.51

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.24

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.96

1.88

-0.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.81

6.07

-3.26

TREX.L vs. VCIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TREX.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the VCIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TREX.L and VCIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TREX.L vs. VCIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TREX.L drawdown since its inception was -23.38%, which is greater than VCIT's maximum drawdown of -20.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TREX.L and VCIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TREX.LVCITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.38%

-20.56%

-2.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.96%

-2.96%

-1.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.42%

-6.11%

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.96%

-20.56%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.23%

-1.13%

-9.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.96%

-3.16%

-6.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.36%

0.92%

+0.44%

Volatility

TREX.L vs. VCIT - Volatility Comparison

Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TREX.L) has a higher volatility of 1.82% compared to Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF (VCIT) at 1.48%. This indicates that TREX.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VCIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TREX.LVCITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.82%

1.48%

+0.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.34%

3.15%

+0.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.50%

4.10%

+0.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.49%

6.62%

+0.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.93%

6.28%

+0.65%

TREX.L vs. VCIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TREX.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than VCIT's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TREX.L vs. VCIT - Dividend Comparison

TREX.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.33%, less than VCIT's 4.79% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TREX.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 7-10 Year UCITS ETF Dist
4.33%4.23%4.34%3.48%2.41%1.63%1.81%2.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VCIT
Vanguard Intermediate-Term Corporate Bond ETF
4.79%4.62%4.43%3.72%3.03%2.87%2.78%3.37%3.61%3.21%3.29%3.34%

Frequently Asked Questions


TREX.L and VCIT have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VCIT is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VCIT is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for TREX.L.

TREX.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while VCIT is Corporate Bonds. TREX.L tracks Bloomberg US 7-10 Year Treasury Bond Index, while VCIT tracks Bloomberg U.S. 5-10 Year Corporate Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for TREX.L and 0.03% for VCIT.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TREX.L and VCIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer