TRET.DE vs. LMWE.DE
TRET.DE (VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF) and LMWE.DE (Lyxor FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Developed UCITS ETF Dist (EUR)) are both REIT funds - TRET.DE tracks the GPR Global 100 while LMWE.DE tracks the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TRET.DE returned 3.26%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for LMWE.DE. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TRET.DE charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for LMWE.DE.
Performance
TRET.DE vs. LMWE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRET.DE achieves a 5.31% return, which is significantly lower than LMWE.DE's 7.51% return.
TRET.DE
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- YTD
- 5.31%
- 6M
- 4.13%
- 1Y
- 8.78%
- 3Y*
- 7.84%
- 5Y*
- 3.26%
- 10Y*
- —
LMWE.DE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- YTD
- 7.51%
- 6M
- 6.92%
- 1Y
- 9.15%
- 3Y*
- 4.39%
- 5Y*
- 0.78%
- 10Y*
- 2.38%
TRET.DE vs. LMWE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRET.DE VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 5.31% | 1.87% | 6.86% | 9.89% | -21.28% | 40.76% | -15.21% | 22.15% | -7.54% |
LMWE.DE Lyxor FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Developed UCITS ETF Dist (EUR) | 7.51% | -2.27% | 4.83% | 3.20% | -20.69% | 36.10% | -17.30% | 22.98% | -6.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRET.DE and LMWE.DE is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2018 | 0.92 |
The correlation between TRET.DE and LMWE.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRET.DE vs. LMWE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
TRET.DE
LMWE.DE
TRET.DE vs. LMWE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.DE) and Lyxor FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Developed UCITS ETF Dist (EUR) (LMWE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRET.DE | LMWE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.15 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 1.24 | -0.19 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.38 | 3.96 | -0.58 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRET.DE | LMWE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.75 | 0.86 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.05 | +0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.15 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 0.41 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
TRET.DE vs. LMWE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRET.DE drawdown since its inception was -41.75%, roughly equal to the maximum LMWE.DE drawdown of -42.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRET.DE and LMWE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRET.DE | LMWE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.75% | -42.37% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.35% | -7.88% | -0.47% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.60% | -20.47% | +1.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.36% | -30.69% | +0.33% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.37% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.46% | -11.34% | +6.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.19% | -10.67% | -1.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.59% | 2.42% | +0.17% |
Volatility
TRET.DE vs. LMWE.DE - Volatility Comparison
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.05% compared to Lyxor FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Developed UCITS ETF Dist (EUR) (LMWE.DE) at 2.75%. This indicates that TRET.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMWE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRET.DE | LMWE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.05% | 2.75% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.21% | 8.23% | +0.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.66% | 11.36% | +0.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.15% | 15.24% | -0.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.83% | 16.94% | +0.89% |
TRET.DE vs. LMWE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRET.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than LMWE.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRET.DE vs. LMWE.DE - Dividend Comparison
TRET.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.48%, more than LMWE.DE's 2.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMWE.DE Lyxor FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Developed UCITS ETF Dist (EUR) | 2.42% | 2.61% | 3.75% | 0.00% | 4.18% | 2.22% | 3.76% | 3.37% | 3.76% | 3.44% | 3.65% | 4.01% |
TRET.DE VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 3.48% | 3.66% | 3.44% | 3.66% | 4.69% | 1.78% | 4.45% | 3.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRET.DE and LMWE.DE have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRET.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRET.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LMWE.DE.
TRET.DE tracks GPR Global 100, while LMWE.DE tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TRET.DE and 0.45% for LMWE.DE.
Find the right allocation for TRET.DE and LMWE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer