LMWE.DE vs. ESAD.DE
LMWE.DE (Lyxor FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Developed UCITS ETF Dist (EUR)) and ESAD.DE (BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation) are both REIT funds - LMWE.DE tracks the FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed while ESAD.DE tracks the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green EU CTB. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, LMWE.DE returned 4.39%/yr vs 4.85%/yr for ESAD.DE. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. LMWE.DE charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for ESAD.DE.
Performance
LMWE.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with LMWE.DE having a 7.51% return and ESAD.DE slightly higher at 7.67%.
LMWE.DE
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -1.09%
- YTD
- 7.51%
- 6M
- 6.92%
- 1Y
- 9.15%
- 3Y*
- 4.39%
- 5Y*
- 0.78%
- 10Y*
- 2.38%
ESAD.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- YTD
- 7.67%
- 6M
- 6.84%
- 1Y
- 7.43%
- 3Y*
- 4.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LMWE.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LMWE.DE Lyxor FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Developed UCITS ETF Dist (EUR) | 7.51% | -2.27% | 4.83% | 3.20% | -17.50% |
ESAD.DE BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation | 7.67% | -3.81% | 3.54% | 7.64% | -19.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between LMWE.DE and ESAD.DE is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2022 | 0.87 |
The correlation between LMWE.DE and ESAD.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
LMWE.DE vs. ESAD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
LMWE.DE
ESAD.DE
LMWE.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Developed UCITS ETF Dist (EUR) (LMWE.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation (ESAD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| LMWE.DE | ESAD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.12 | +0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.24 | 0.90 | +0.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.96 | 2.70 | +1.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| LMWE.DE | ESAD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 | 0.63 | +0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.05 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | -0.12 | +0.53 |
Drawdowns
LMWE.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum LMWE.DE drawdown since its inception was -42.37%, which is greater than ESAD.DE's maximum drawdown of -30.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for LMWE.DE and ESAD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| LMWE.DE | ESAD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.37% | -30.37% | -12.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.88% | -8.26% | +0.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.47% | -17.22% | -3.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.37% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.34% | -11.52% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.67% | -17.56% | +6.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 2.75% | -0.33% |
Volatility
LMWE.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Developed UCITS ETF Dist (EUR) (LMWE.DE) is 2.75%, while BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation (ESAD.DE) has a volatility of 2.98%. This indicates that LMWE.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ESAD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| LMWE.DE | ESAD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.75% | 2.98% | -0.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.23% | 9.07% | -0.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.36% | 11.74% | -0.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.24% | 14.78% | +0.46% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.94% | 14.78% | +2.16% |
LMWE.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
LMWE.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ESAD.DE's 0.41% expense ratio.
Dividends
LMWE.DE vs. ESAD.DE - Dividend Comparison
LMWE.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, while ESAD.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ESAD.DE BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF EUR Capitalisation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
LMWE.DE Lyxor FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Global Developed UCITS ETF Dist (EUR) | 2.42% | 2.61% | 3.75% | 0.00% | 4.18% | 2.22% | 3.76% | 3.37% | 3.76% | 3.44% | 3.65% | 4.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
LMWE.DE and ESAD.DE have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ESAD.DE is cheaper at 0.41% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ESAD.DE is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for LMWE.DE.
LMWE.DE tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed, while ESAD.DE tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green EU CTB. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for LMWE.DE and 0.41% for ESAD.DE.
Find the right allocation for LMWE.DE and ESAD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer