PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRET.AS vs. VEVE.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRET.AS vs. VEVE.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.AS) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (VEVE.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRET.AS achieves a 5.17% return, which is significantly lower than VEVE.AS's 12.81% return. Over the past 10 years, TRET.AS has underperformed VEVE.AS with an annualized return of 3.57%, while VEVE.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 12.95% annualized return.


TRET.AS

1D
0.05%
1M
-2.38%
YTD
5.17%
6M
3.91%
1Y
8.39%
3Y*
7.79%
5Y*
3.24%
10Y*
3.57%

VEVE.AS

1D
-0.27%
1M
5.23%
YTD
12.81%
6M
13.33%
1Y
26.42%
3Y*
18.25%
5Y*
13.13%
10Y*
12.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRET.AS vs. VEVE.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRET.AS
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF
5.17%1.05%8.21%9.09%-21.18%40.50%-14.55%21.60%0.17%-3.69%
VEVE.AS
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF
12.81%8.22%26.33%19.38%-13.20%31.47%6.50%29.40%-4.85%8.40%

Correlation

The correlation between TRET.AS and VEVE.AS is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2014

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between TRET.AS and VEVE.AS has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRET.AS vs. VEVE.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRET.AS
TRET.AS Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
TRET.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRET.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRET.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
TRET.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRET.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

VEVE.AS
VEVE.AS Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
VEVE.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEVE.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEVE.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
VEVE.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEVE.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRET.AS vs. VEVE.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.AS) and Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (VEVE.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRET.ASVEVE.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.45

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

4.21

-3.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.30

17.34

-14.04

TRET.AS vs. VEVE.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRET.AS Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the VEVE.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRET.AS and VEVE.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRET.ASVEVE.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

2.35

-1.65

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.93

-0.71

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.72

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

0.35

-0.35

Drawdowns

TRET.AS vs. VEVE.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRET.AS drawdown since its inception was -99.19%, which is greater than VEVE.AS's maximum drawdown of -33.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRET.AS and VEVE.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRET.ASVEVE.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.19%

-33.57%

-65.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.09%

-6.19%

-1.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.23%

-21.08%

+3.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.50%

-21.08%

-9.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.80%

-33.57%

-8.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.59%

-0.56%

-97.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-96.63%

-6.76%

-89.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

1.51%

+1.01%

Volatility

TRET.AS vs. VEVE.AS - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.AS) has a higher volatility of 3.66% compared to Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF (VEVE.AS) at 2.88%. This indicates that TRET.AS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VEVE.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRET.ASVEVE.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

2.88%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.01%

7.89%

+1.12%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.81%

11.08%

+0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.87%

13.90%

+0.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.25%

17.61%

-1.36%

TRET.AS vs. VEVE.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRET.AS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than VEVE.AS's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TRET.AS vs. VEVE.AS - Dividend Comparison

TRET.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than VEVE.AS's 1.23% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TRET.AS
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF
3.49%3.66%3.41%3.67%4.68%1.78%4.43%3.33%4.31%3.16%3.13%2.55%
VEVE.AS
Vanguard FTSE Developed World UCITS ETF
1.23%1.41%1.46%1.73%2.04%1.43%1.61%1.89%2.28%1.97%1.98%2.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRET.AS and VEVE.AS have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VEVE.AS is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VEVE.AS is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for TRET.AS.

TRET.AS is categorized as REIT, while VEVE.AS is Global Equities. TRET.AS tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while VEVE.AS tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TRET.AS and 0.12% for VEVE.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRET.AS and VEVE.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer