TRET.AS vs. TEET.AS
TRET.AS (VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF) and TEET.AS (VanEck Sustainable European Equal Weight UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TRET.AS is a REIT fund tracking the FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while TEET.AS is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, TRET.AS returned 3.57%/yr vs 9.90%/yr for TEET.AS. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TRET.AS charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for TEET.AS.
Performance
TRET.AS vs. TEET.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRET.AS achieves a 5.12% return, which is significantly lower than TEET.AS's 7.02% return. Over the past 10 years, TRET.AS has underperformed TEET.AS with an annualized return of 3.57%, while TEET.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 9.90% annualized return.
TRET.AS
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- -2.14%
- YTD
- 5.12%
- 6M
- 3.98%
- 1Y
- 8.27%
- 3Y*
- 7.75%
- 5Y*
- 3.23%
- 10Y*
- 3.57%
TEET.AS
- 1D
- -0.89%
- 1M
- 4.81%
- YTD
- 7.02%
- 6M
- 10.57%
- 1Y
- 16.54%
- 3Y*
- 15.53%
- 5Y*
- 10.56%
- 10Y*
- 9.90%
TRET.AS vs. TEET.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRET.AS VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 5.12% | 1.05% | 8.21% | 9.09% | -21.18% | 40.50% | -14.55% | 21.60% | 0.17% | -3.69% |
TEET.AS VanEck Sustainable European Equal Weight UCITS ETF | 7.02% | 20.97% | 12.42% | 19.69% | -12.13% | 27.86% | -2.86% | 23.14% | -8.80% | 10.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRET.AS and TEET.AS is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2014 | 0.54 |
The correlation between TRET.AS and TEET.AS shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (1 year) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRET.AS vs. TEET.AS — Risk / Return Rank
TRET.AS
TEET.AS
TRET.AS vs. TEET.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.AS) and VanEck Sustainable European Equal Weight UCITS ETF (TEET.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRET.AS | TEET.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.71 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.22 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 1.59 | -0.58 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.28 | 5.94 | -2.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRET.AS | TEET.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.69 | 1.15 | -0.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.69 | -0.47 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.22 | 0.59 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.00 | 0.49 | -0.50 |
Drawdowns
TRET.AS vs. TEET.AS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRET.AS drawdown since its inception was -99.19%, which is greater than TEET.AS's maximum drawdown of -37.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRET.AS and TEET.AS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRET.AS | TEET.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.19% | -37.47% | -61.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.09% | -10.30% | +2.21% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.23% | -16.91% | -0.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.50% | -22.84% | -7.66% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.80% | -37.47% | -4.33% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.59% | -1.65% | -95.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -96.63% | -5.91% | -90.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.51% | 2.76% | -0.25% |
Volatility
TRET.AS vs. TEET.AS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.AS) is 3.81%, while VanEck Sustainable European Equal Weight UCITS ETF (TEET.AS) has a volatility of 5.10%. This indicates that TRET.AS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TEET.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRET.AS | TEET.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.81% | 5.10% | -1.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.01% | 11.81% | -2.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.81% | 14.16% | -2.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.87% | 15.18% | -0.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.25% | 16.71% | -0.46% |
TRET.AS vs. TEET.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRET.AS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than TEET.AS's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TRET.AS vs. TEET.AS - Dividend Comparison
TRET.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.51%, more than TEET.AS's 4.23% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TEET.AS VanEck Sustainable European Equal Weight UCITS ETF | 2.70% | 2.47% | 2.71% | 2.68% | 2.97% | 2.48% | 2.37% | 3.72% | 3.66% | 2.39% | 3.17% | 2.52% |
TRET.AS VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF | 3.49% | 3.66% | 3.41% | 3.67% | 4.68% | 1.78% | 4.43% | 3.33% | 4.31% | 3.16% | 3.13% | 2.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRET.AS and TEET.AS have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TEET.AS is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TEET.AS is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for TRET.AS.
TRET.AS is categorized as REIT, while TEET.AS is Europe Equities. TRET.AS tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while TEET.AS tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TRET.AS and 0.20% for TEET.AS.
Find the right allocation for TRET.AS and TEET.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer