PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRET.AS vs. TDT.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRET.AS vs. TDT.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.AS) and VanEck AEX UCITS ETF (TDT.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRET.AS achieves a 5.17% return, which is significantly lower than TDT.AS's 11.73% return. Over the past 10 years, TRET.AS has underperformed TDT.AS with an annualized return of 3.57%, while TDT.AS has yielded a comparatively higher 11.70% annualized return.


TRET.AS

1D
0.05%
1M
-2.38%
YTD
5.17%
6M
3.91%
1Y
8.39%
3Y*
7.79%
5Y*
3.24%
10Y*
3.57%

TDT.AS

1D
0.21%
1M
3.97%
YTD
11.73%
6M
11.77%
1Y
15.84%
3Y*
13.79%
5Y*
10.32%
10Y*
11.70%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRET.AS vs. TDT.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRET.AS
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF
5.17%1.05%8.21%9.09%-21.18%40.50%-14.55%21.60%0.17%-3.69%
TDT.AS
VanEck AEX UCITS ETF
11.73%10.57%14.47%16.93%-12.00%30.49%5.32%28.01%-7.60%16.18%

Correlation

The correlation between TRET.AS and TDT.AS is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.34

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2011

0.52

The correlation between TRET.AS and TDT.AS shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (3 years) to 0.52 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRET.AS vs. TDT.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRET.AS
TRET.AS Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
TRET.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRET.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRET.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
TRET.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRET.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

TDT.AS
TDT.AS Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
TDT.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDT.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDT.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
TDT.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDT.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRET.AS vs. TDT.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.AS) and VanEck AEX UCITS ETF (TDT.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRET.ASTDT.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.47

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.21

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.02

2.23

-1.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.30

5.59

-2.29

TRET.AS vs. TDT.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRET.AS Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the TDT.AS Sharpe Ratio of 1.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRET.AS and TDT.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRET.ASTDT.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

1.17

-0.47

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.66

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

0.71

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.00

0.60

-0.60

Drawdowns

TRET.AS vs. TDT.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRET.AS drawdown since its inception was -99.19%, which is greater than TDT.AS's maximum drawdown of -35.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRET.AS and TDT.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRET.ASTDT.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.19%

-35.61%

-63.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.09%

-7.00%

-1.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.23%

-15.87%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.50%

-22.17%

-8.33%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.80%

-35.61%

-6.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-97.59%

-0.52%

-97.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-96.63%

-5.63%

-91.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.52%

2.81%

-0.29%

Volatility

TRET.AS vs. TDT.AS - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TRET.AS) and VanEck AEX UCITS ETF (TDT.AS) have volatilities of 3.66% and 3.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRET.ASTDT.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.66%

3.79%

-0.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.01%

10.69%

-1.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.81%

13.34%

-1.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.87%

15.38%

-0.51%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.25%

16.22%

+0.03%

TRET.AS vs. TDT.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRET.AS has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than TDT.AS's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRET.AS vs. TDT.AS - Dividend Comparison

TRET.AS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.49%, more than TDT.AS's 2.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TDT.AS
VanEck AEX UCITS ETF
2.02%2.28%2.40%2.24%2.32%1.69%1.75%3.24%3.37%3.04%3.28%2.54%
TRET.AS
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF
3.49%3.66%3.41%3.67%4.68%1.78%4.43%3.33%4.31%3.16%3.13%2.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRET.AS and TDT.AS have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TRET.AS is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRET.AS is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for TDT.AS.

TRET.AS is categorized as REIT, while TDT.AS is Europe Equities. TRET.AS tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while TDT.AS tracks Euronext AEX All Share TR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TRET.AS and 0.30% for TDT.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRET.AS and TDT.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer