PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRES.L vs. IBTL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRES.L vs. IBTL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRES.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TRES.L is traded in USD, while IBTL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IBTL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRES.L achieves a 0.33% return, which is significantly lower than IBTL.L's 1.30% return.


TRES.L

1D
0.11%
1M
0.99%
YTD
0.33%
6M
0.55%
1Y
3.60%
3Y*
3.08%
5Y*
-0.28%
10Y*

IBTL.L

1D
-0.06%
1M
3.01%
YTD
1.30%
6M
1.89%
1Y
4.88%
3Y*
-1.38%
5Y*
-6.02%
10Y*
-1.79%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRES.L vs. IBTL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TRES.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist
0.33%6.40%0.91%3.83%-12.32%-2.35%7.76%6.98%
IBTL.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist)
1.30%4.53%-7.08%1.47%-30.49%-4.20%16.53%16.37%

Correlation

The correlation between TRES.L and IBTL.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2019

0.86

The correlation between TRES.L and IBTL.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRES.L vs. IBTL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRES.L
TRES.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
TRES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
TRES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

IBTL.L
IBTL.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
IBTL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBTL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBTL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
IBTL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBTL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRES.L vs. IBTL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRES.L) and iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRES.LIBTL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.09

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.23

0.63

+0.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.53

1.53

+2.00

TRES.L vs. IBTL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRES.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is higher than the IBTL.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRES.L and IBTL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRES.L vs. IBTL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRES.L drawdown since its inception was -18.76%, smaller than the maximum IBTL.L drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRES.L and IBTL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRES.LIBTL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.76%

-48.47%

+29.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.93%

-7.69%

+4.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.06%

-18.09%

+13.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.41%

-42.83%

+26.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-48.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.16%

-39.40%

+33.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.85%

-20.66%

+12.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

3.19%

-2.17%

Volatility

TRES.L vs. IBTL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRES.L) is 0.96%, while iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTL.L) has a volatility of 2.60%. This indicates that TRES.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBTL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRES.LIBTL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.96%

2.60%

-1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.71%

6.75%

-4.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.04%

9.94%

-5.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.70%

15.30%

-9.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.34%

14.76%

-9.42%

TRES.L vs. IBTL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRES.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than IBTL.L's 0.07% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TRES.L vs. IBTL.L - Dividend Comparison

TRES.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, less than IBTL.L's 4.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IBTL.L
iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist)
4.57%4.31%4.58%3.79%2.96%1.72%1.86%2.54%2.75%2.68%2.45%2.09%
TRES.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist
4.26%4.19%4.25%3.78%1.96%1.14%1.58%1.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRES.L and IBTL.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TRES.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRES.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IBTL.L.

TRES.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Index, while IBTL.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for TRES.L and 0.07% for IBTL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRES.L and IBTL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer