IBTL.L vs. IDTL.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTL.L) and iShares Treasury Bond 20+ UCITS (IDTL.L).
IBTL.L and IDTL.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. IBTL.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Government TR USD. It was launched on Jan 20, 2015. IDTL.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Government TR USD. It was launched on Jan 20, 2015. Both IBTL.L and IDTL.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: IBTL.L or IDTL.L.
Key characteristics
| IBTL.L | IDTL.L | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -7.25% | -5.39% |
| 1Y Return | -1.22% | 5.32% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -13.53% | -12.25% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -7.90% | -5.63% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.02 | 0.45 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.07 | 0.75 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.01 | 1.09 |
| Calmar Ratio | -0.00 | 0.15 |
| Martin Ratio | -0.04 | 1.17 |
| Ulcer Index | 6.02% | 5.74% |
| Daily Std Dev | 13.63% | 14.95% |
| Max Drawdown | -51.49% | -48.31% |
| Current Drawdown | -49.60% | -41.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between IBTL.L and IDTL.L is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
IBTL.L vs. IDTL.L - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, IBTL.L achieves a -7.25% return, which is significantly lower than IDTL.L's -5.39% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
IBTL.L vs. IDTL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IBTL.L and IDTL.L have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
IBTL.L vs. IDTL.L - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTL.L) and iShares Treasury Bond 20+ UCITS (IDTL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
IBTL.L vs. IDTL.L - Dividend Comparison
IBTL.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.36%, which matches IDTL.L's 4.35% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IBTL.L iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist) | 4.36% | 3.82% | 2.95% | 1.73% | 1.86% | 2.54% | 2.75% | 2.66% | 2.42% | 2.07% |
IDTL.L iShares Treasury Bond 20+ UCITS | 4.35% | 3.79% | 3.01% | 1.74% | 1.76% | 2.49% | 2.79% | 2.60% | 2.63% | 2.14% |
Drawdowns
IBTL.L vs. IDTL.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IBTL.L drawdown since its inception was -51.49%, which is greater than IDTL.L's maximum drawdown of -48.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IBTL.L and IDTL.L. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
IBTL.L vs. IDTL.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IBTL.L) and iShares Treasury Bond 20+ UCITS (IDTL.L) have volatilities of 4.71% and 4.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.