PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRES.L vs. TRE7.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRES.L vs. TRE7.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRES.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 3-7 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRE7.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRES.L achieves a -0.48% return, which is significantly higher than TRE7.L's -0.63% return.


TRES.L

1D
-0.21%
1M
-0.22%
YTD
-0.48%
6M
-0.24%
1Y
3.85%
3Y*
2.81%
5Y*
-0.40%
10Y*

TRE7.L

1D
-0.17%
1M
-0.43%
YTD
-0.63%
6M
-0.39%
1Y
3.37%
3Y*
3.58%
5Y*
0.34%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRES.L vs. TRE7.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TRES.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist
-0.48%6.57%0.75%3.82%-12.15%-2.44%8.00%5.79%
TRE7.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 3-7 Year UCITS ETF Dist
-0.63%7.31%2.08%4.25%-9.37%-2.35%6.98%5.01%

Correlation

The correlation between TRES.L and TRE7.L is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.88

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2019

0.86

The correlation between TRES.L and TRE7.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRES.L vs. TRE7.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRES.L
TRES.L Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
TRES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
TRES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

TRE7.L
TRE7.L Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
TRE7.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRE7.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRE7.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
TRE7.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRE7.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRES.L vs. TRE7.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRES.L) and Invesco US Treasury Bond 3-7 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRE7.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TRES.LTRE7.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.21

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

1.34

-0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.11

4.29

-0.19

TRES.L vs. TRE7.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRES.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is comparable to the TRE7.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRES.L and TRE7.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TRES.LTRE7.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.94

1.14

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.07

0.07

-0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.22

0.41

-0.19

Drawdowns

TRES.L vs. TRE7.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRES.L drawdown since its inception was -18.77%, which is greater than TRE7.L's maximum drawdown of -14.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRES.L and TRE7.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRES.LTRE7.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.77%

-14.12%

-4.65%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.93%

-2.51%

-0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.16%

-3.71%

-1.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.40%

-13.54%

-2.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.94%

-1.79%

-5.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.61%

-4.44%

-4.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.94%

0.78%

+0.16%

Volatility

TRES.L vs. TRE7.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRES.L) has a higher volatility of 1.36% compared to Invesco US Treasury Bond 3-7 Year UCITS ETF Dist (TRE7.L) at 1.20%. This indicates that TRES.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TRE7.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRES.LTRE7.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.36%

1.20%

+0.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.76%

2.14%

+0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.08%

2.95%

+1.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.73%

4.75%

+0.98%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.67%

4.26%

+1.41%

TRES.L vs. TRE7.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TRES.L and TRE7.L have an expense ratio of 0.06%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TRES.L vs. TRE7.L - Dividend Comparison

TRES.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.26%, more than TRE7.L's 4.14% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
TRE7.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond 3-7 Year UCITS ETF Dist
4.14%4.09%4.23%3.61%1.72%0.87%1.29%1.89%
TRES.L
Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist
4.26%4.19%4.26%3.78%1.96%1.14%1.58%1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRES.L and TRE7.L have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.06% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TRES.L and TRE7.L have the same expense ratio: 0.06% per year.

TRES.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Index, while TRE7.L tracks Bloomberg US 3-7 Year Treasury Bond Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRES.L and TRE7.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer