TRES.L vs. FWRG.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TRES.L (Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist) and FWRG.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - TRES.L is a Government Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Index, while FWRG.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TRES.L returned 3.62% vs 30.08% for FWRG.L. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TRES.L charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FWRG.L.

Performance

TRES.L vs. FWRG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRES.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRES.L achieves a -0.30% return, which is significantly lower than FWRG.L's 11.92% return.

TRES.L

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: -0.30%
• 6M: 0.09%
• 1Y: 3.62%
• 3Y*: 2.90%
• 5Y*: -0.37%
• 10Y*: —

FWRG.L

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 5.35%
• YTD: 11.92%
• 6M: 12.40%
• 1Y: 30.08%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRES.L vs. FWRG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
TRES.L Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist	-0.30%	6.57%	0.75%	2.44%
FWRG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc	11.92%	13.84%	20.11%	8.08%

Correlation

The correlation between TRES.L and FWRG.L is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023	0.05

The correlation between TRES.L and FWRG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (all time) to 0.17 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TRES.L vs. FWRG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRES.L

TRES.L Risk / Return Rank: 26
TRES.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
TRES.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
TRES.L Omega Ratio Rank: 24
TRES.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
TRES.L Martin Ratio Rank: 28

FWRG.L

FWRG.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
FWRG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
FWRG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
FWRG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
FWRG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
FWRG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRES.L vs. FWRG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRES.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRES.L	FWRG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.89	2.91	-2.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.36	4.02	-2.66
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.16	1.56	-0.40
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.23	4.20	-2.96
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.84	16.96	-13.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRES.L vs. FWRG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRES.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is lower than the FWRG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRES.L and FWRG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRES.L	FWRG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89	2.91	-2.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.07	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.23	1.51	-1.28

Drawdowns

TRES.L vs. FWRG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRES.L drawdown since its inception was -18.77%, roughly equal to the maximum FWRG.L drawdown of -18.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRES.L and FWRG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRES.L	FWRG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.77%	-18.88%	+0.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.93%	-7.14%	+4.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.16%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.77%	-0.43%	-6.34%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.61%	-2.28%	-6.33%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.94%	1.77%	-0.83%

Volatility

TRES.L vs. FWRG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist (TRES.L) is 1.36%, while Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc (FWRG.L) has a volatility of 2.96%. This indicates that TRES.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWRG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRES.L	FWRG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.36%	2.96%	-1.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.75%	7.69%	-4.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.08%	10.30%	-6.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.73%	12.40%	-6.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.67%	12.40%	-6.73%

TRES.L vs. FWRG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRES.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than FWRG.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TRES.L vs. FWRG.L - Dividend Comparison

TRES.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, while FWRG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FWRG.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TRES.L Invesco US Treasury Bond UCITS ETF Dist	4.25%	4.19%	4.26%	3.78%	1.96%	1.14%	1.58%	1.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRES.L and FWRG.L in my portfolio?

TRES.L and FWRG.L have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TRES.L or FWRG.L?

On fees, TRES.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TRES.L or FWRG.L?

TRES.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for FWRG.L.

What is the main difference between TRES.L and FWRG.L?

TRES.L is categorized as Government Bonds, while FWRG.L is Global Equities. TRES.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Index, while FWRG.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for TRES.L and 0.15% for FWRG.L.