PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TREG.L vs. ASRM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TREG.L vs. ASRM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TREG.L) and BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF (ASRM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TREG.L is traded in GBP, while ASRM.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the ASRM.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


TREG.L

1D
-0.38%
1M
-3.10%
YTD
2.95%
6M
1.90%
1Y
10.15%
3Y*
7.67%
5Y*
3.19%
10Y*

ASRM.DE

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TREG.L vs. ASRM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TREG.L
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF
2.95%6.62%2.78%7.64%-16.77%31.33%-10.04%10.49%
ASRM.DE
BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF
0.00%6.15%-79.39%-5.67%1.40%-6.22%-11.70%-12.77%

Correlation

The correlation between TREG.L and ASRM.DE is 0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.00

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 21, 2019

0.03

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TREG.L vs. ASRM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TREG.L
TREG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
TREG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TREG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
TREG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
TREG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
TREG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

ASRM.DE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TREG.L vs. ASRM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF (TREG.L) and BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF (ASRM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TREG.LASRM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.50

TREG.L vs. ASRM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TREG.LASRM.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

Drawdowns

TREG.L vs. ASRM.DE - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TREG.LASRM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.39%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

Volatility

TREG.L vs. ASRM.DE - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TREG.LASRM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.97%

TREG.L vs. ASRM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

TREG.L has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than ASRM.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

TREG.L vs. ASRM.DE - Dividend Comparison

TREG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.43%, while ASRM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
ASRM.DE
BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TREG.L
VanEck Global Real Estate UCITS ETF
3.43%3.57%3.48%3.64%4.54%1.82%4.49%3.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


TREG.L and ASRM.DE have a correlation of 0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TREG.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TREG.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ASRM.DE.

TREG.L tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Global TR USD, while ASRM.DE tracks FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green EU CTB. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and BNP Paribas. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for TREG.L and 0.40% for ASRM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TREG.L and ASRM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer