ASRM.DE vs. EMEH.DE

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF (ASRM.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (EMEH.DE).

ASRM.DE and EMEH.DE are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ASRM.DE is a passively managed fund by BNP Paribas that tracks the performance of the FTSE EPRA Nareit Developed Green EU CTB. It was launched on Dec 9, 2021. EMEH.DE is a passively managed fund by BNP Paribas that tracks the performance of the BNP Paribas Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll (EUR Hedged). It was launched on Sep 22, 2017. Both ASRM.DE and EMEH.DE are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

ASRM.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF (ASRM.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (EMEH.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

ASRM.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ASRM.DE BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	-78.40%	-3.99%	-3.83%	0.89%	-16.42%	-14.47%	3.07%	-5.00%
EMEH.DE BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR	17.62%	25.40%	6.63%	-12.26%	11.15%	27.11%	-4.42%	7.62%	-90.10%	4.93%

Returns By Period

ASRM.DE

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMEH.DE

• 1D: -0.89%
• 1M: 5.13%
• YTD: 17.62%
• 6M: 29.65%
• 1Y: 34.92%
• 3Y*: 13.44%
• 5Y*: 13.07%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ASRM.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ASRM.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than EMEH.DE's 0.39% expense ratio.

ASRM.DE

BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF

EMEH.DE

BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR

Return for Risk

ASRM.DE vs. EMEH.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMEH.DE

EMEH.DE Risk / Return Rank: 87
EMEH.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
EMEH.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
EMEH.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 85
EMEH.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 93
EMEH.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ASRM.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BNP Paribas Easy FTSE EPRA Nareit Global Developed Green CTB UCITS ETF (ASRM.DE) and BNP Paribas Easy Energy & Metals Enhanced Roll UCITS ETF EUR (EMEH.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ASRM.DE	EMEH.DE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.86	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	-0.49	—

Correlation

The correlation between ASRM.DE and EMEH.DE is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

ASRM.DE vs. EMEH.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither ASRM.DE nor EMEH.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	ASRM.DE	EMEH.DE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-92.42%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-11.16%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-32.73%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-80.94%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-81.40%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	3.22%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	ASRM.DE	EMEH.DE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.74%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	15.47%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	18.65%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	17.39%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	34.43%	—