PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRDIX vs. PDT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRDIX vs. PDT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transamerica Sustainable Equity Income Fund (TRDIX) and John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRDIX achieves a 21.19% return, which is significantly higher than PDT's 6.22% return. Over the past 10 years, TRDIX has outperformed PDT with an annualized return of 8.52%, while PDT has yielded a comparatively lower 5.62% annualized return.


TRDIX

1D
1.55%
1M
1.46%
6M
15.22%
YTD
21.19%
1Y
29.02%
3Y*
17.41%
5Y*
9.21%
10Y*
8.52%
ALL TIME*
7.65%

PDT

1D
-0.23%
1M
0.37%
6M
3.17%
YTD
6.22%
1Y
4.26%
3Y*
13.94%
5Y*
2.86%
10Y*
5.62%
ALL TIME*
6.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.46M$1.42M$1.61M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TRDIX vs. PDT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRDIX
Transamerica Sustainable Equity Income Fund
21.19%11.15%16.62%6.17%-11.25%22.44%-7.53%23.47%-12.21%16.22%
PDT
John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund
6.22%7.64%29.92%-9.55%-16.30%25.98%-14.20%39.29%-12.49%21.22%

Correlation

The correlation between TRDIX and PDT is 0.43, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.53

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.41

The correlation between TRDIX and PDT shifts across timeframes, from 0.41 (all time) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRDIX vs. PDT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TRDIX
TRDIX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
TRDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TRDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

PDT
PDT Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
PDT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDT Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
PDT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDT Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TRDIX vs. PDT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Sustainable Equity Income Fund (TRDIX) and John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRDIXPDTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.62

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.09

+0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.56

0.81

+1.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.73

1.70

+9.04

TRDIX vs. PDT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRDIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.11, which is higher than the PDT Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRDIX and PDT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRDIX vs. PDT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRDIX drawdown since its inception was -47.02%, smaller than the maximum PDT drawdown of -62.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRDIX and PDT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRDIXPDTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.02%

-62.39%

+15.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.50%

-5.38%

-5.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.15%

-17.14%

+1.99%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.35%

-40.44%

+9.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.02%

-62.39%

+15.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.92%

+1.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.86%

-9.99%

+1.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

2.56%

-0.06%

Volatility

TRDIX vs. PDT - Volatility Comparison

Transamerica Sustainable Equity Income Fund (TRDIX) has a higher volatility of 3.19% compared to John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund (PDT) at 1.65%. This indicates that TRDIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRDIXPDTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

1.65%

+1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.33%

6.92%

+3.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.76%

8.88%

+3.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.94%

16.92%

+1.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.76%

25.09%

-5.33%

TRDIX vs. PDT - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRDIX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is lower than PDT's 5.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRDIX vs. PDT - Dividend Comparison

TRDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.17%, less than PDT's 7.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PDT
John Hancock Premium Dividend Fund
7.72%7.80%7.77%10.14%9.04%6.42%8.43%6.70%8.69%9.94%9.15%7.88%
TRDIX
Transamerica Sustainable Equity Income Fund
1.17%1.47%8.93%1.89%2.13%17.89%2.19%15.03%20.64%8.73%16.84%19.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRDIX and PDT have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRDIX has higher volatility (3.19%) compared to PDT (1.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRDIX dropped -47.02% vs PDT's -62.39%.

TRDIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRDIX and PDT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer