PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRDFX vs. SJCIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRDFX vs. SJCIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crossmark Steward Values-FocusedSmall-Mid Cap Enhanced Index Fund (TRDFX) and Crossmark Steward Large Cap Core Fund (SJCIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRDFX achieves a 15.79% return, which is significantly higher than SJCIX's 13.04% return.


TRDFX

1D
0.79%
1M
-0.99%
6M
10.84%
YTD
15.79%
1Y
25.59%
3Y*
11.50%
5Y*
7.05%
10Y*
9.44%
ALL TIME*
6.40%

SJCIX

1D
1.12%
1M
2.85%
6M
11.78%
YTD
13.04%
1Y
23.04%
3Y*
18.13%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TRDFX vs. SJCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TRDFX
Crossmark Steward Values-FocusedSmall-Mid Cap Enhanced Index Fund
15.79%5.76%9.90%15.86%-5.47%
SJCIX
Crossmark Steward Large Cap Core Fund
13.04%10.93%23.23%24.01%-7.99%

Correlation

The correlation between TRDFX and SJCIX is 0.82, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.82

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 24, 2022

0.88

The correlation between TRDFX and SJCIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRDFX vs. SJCIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TRDFX
TRDFX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
TRDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
TRDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

SJCIX
SJCIX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
SJCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SJCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SJCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SJCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
SJCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TRDFX vs. SJCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Steward Values-FocusedSmall-Mid Cap Enhanced Index Fund (TRDFX) and Crossmark Steward Large Cap Core Fund (SJCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRDFXSJCIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.26

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.61

2.08

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.09

8.35

+0.74

TRDFX vs. SJCIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRDFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is comparable to the SJCIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRDFX and SJCIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRDFX vs. SJCIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRDFX drawdown since its inception was -61.60%, which is greater than SJCIX's maximum drawdown of -22.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRDFX and SJCIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRDFXSJCIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.60%

-22.12%

-39.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.55%

-9.86%

+1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.32%

-20.47%

-5.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.44%

0.00%

-2.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.92%

-5.43%

-7.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.47%

2.45%

+0.02%

Volatility

TRDFX vs. SJCIX - Volatility Comparison

Crossmark Steward Values-FocusedSmall-Mid Cap Enhanced Index Fund (TRDFX) has a higher volatility of 3.44% compared to Crossmark Steward Large Cap Core Fund (SJCIX) at 3.04%. This indicates that TRDFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SJCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRDFXSJCIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.44%

3.04%

+0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.40%

10.48%

+0.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.96%

13.67%

+2.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.92%

17.80%

+4.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.79%

17.80%

+4.99%

TRDFX vs. SJCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRDFX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than SJCIX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRDFX vs. SJCIX - Dividend Comparison

TRDFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.57%, more than SJCIX's 5.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SJCIX
Crossmark Steward Large Cap Core Fund
5.74%6.49%1.42%0.74%0.96%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TRDFX
Crossmark Steward Values-FocusedSmall-Mid Cap Enhanced Index Fund
7.57%8.76%6.18%4.29%28.61%13.92%4.16%3.50%15.78%7.77%3.51%13.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRDFX and SJCIX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRDFX has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to SJCIX (3.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRDFX dropped -61.60% vs SJCIX's -22.12%.

SJCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.50 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRDFX and SJCIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer