TRBFX vs. ANBIX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TRBFX (T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund) and ANBIX (AB Bond Inflation Strategy) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, TRBFX returned 2.93%/yr vs 3.64%/yr for ANBIX. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TRBFX charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for ANBIX.

Performance

TRBFX vs. ANBIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund (TRBFX) and AB Bond Inflation Strategy (ANBIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRBFX achieves a 1.76% return, which is significantly higher than ANBIX's 1.58% return. Over the past 10 years, TRBFX has underperformed ANBIX with an annualized return of 2.93%, while ANBIX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.64% annualized return.

TRBFX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.10%
• YTD: 1.76%
• 6M: 1.77%
• 1Y: 4.45%
• 3Y*: 4.95%
• 5Y*: 2.48%
• 10Y*: 2.93%

ANBIX

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: 1.58%
• 6M: 1.58%
• 1Y: 4.33%
• 3Y*: 5.15%
• 5Y*: 2.34%
• 10Y*: 3.64%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRBFX vs. ANBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TRBFX T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund	1.76%	6.34%	4.60%	3.01%	-5.19%	5.77%	5.65%	6.53%	0.28%	0.80%
ANBIX AB Bond Inflation Strategy	1.58%	7.52%	3.20%	5.20%	-8.50%	6.35%	9.35%	9.29%	-0.76%	2.93%

Correlation

The correlation between TRBFX and ANBIX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.65
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.69
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 7, 2015	0.71

The correlation between TRBFX and ANBIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (1 year) to 0.76 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

TRBFX vs. ANBIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRBFX

TRBFX Risk / Return Rank: 21
TRBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
TRBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
TRBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 54
TRBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
TRBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

ANBIX

ANBIX Risk / Return Rank: 75
ANBIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
ANBIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
ANBIX Omega Ratio Rank: 67
ANBIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
ANBIX Martin Ratio Rank: 87

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRBFX vs. ANBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund (TRBFX) and AB Bond Inflation Strategy (ANBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TRBFX	ANBIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.95	2.19	-1.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.42	3.55	-2.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.45	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.38	4.35	-2.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.79	16.38	-13.59
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TRBFX vs. ANBIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRBFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is lower than the ANBIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRBFX and ANBIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TRBFX	ANBIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.95	2.19	-1.23
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.49	0.52	-0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	0.91	-0.18
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.72	0.86	-0.14

Drawdowns

TRBFX vs. ANBIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRBFX drawdown since its inception was -7.33%, smaller than the maximum ANBIX drawdown of -11.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRBFX and ANBIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TRBFX	ANBIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.33%	-11.56%	+4.23%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.48%	-1.05%	-2.43%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.51%	-2.52%	-0.99%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-7.33%	-10.85%	+3.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-7.33%	-11.56%	+4.23%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.36%	-0.03%	-1.33%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.42%	-2.19%	+0.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.70%	0.28%	+1.42%

Volatility

TRBFX vs. ANBIX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund (TRBFX) and AB Bond Inflation Strategy (ANBIX) have volatilities of 0.61% and 0.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TRBFX	ANBIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.61%	0.60%	+0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.76%	1.44%	+3.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.06%	2.10%	+2.96%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.15%	4.49%	+0.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.01%	4.00%	+0.01%

TRBFX vs. ANBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRBFX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than ANBIX's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

TRBFX vs. ANBIX - Dividend Comparison

TRBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.79%, more than ANBIX's 4.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ANBIX AB Bond Inflation Strategy	4.27%	4.93%	3.86%	4.55%	6.47%	4.70%	2.22%	3.19%	3.39%	2.05%	2.13%	1.61%
TRBFX T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund	4.79%	4.95%	4.48%	3.64%	6.11%	4.99%	1.38%	3.27%	2.34%	1.61%	1.10%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TRBFX and ANBIX in my portfolio?

TRBFX and ANBIX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TRBFX or ANBIX?

TRBFX has higher volatility (0.61%) compared to ANBIX (0.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRBFX dropped -7.33% vs ANBIX's -11.56%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ANBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.