TRBFX vs. ANBIX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund (TRBFX) and AB Bond Inflation Strategy (ANBIX).
TRBFX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Sep 28, 2006. ANBIX is managed by AllianceBernstein. It was launched on Jan 25, 2010.
Performance
TRBFX vs. ANBIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TRBFX vs. ANBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRBFX T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund | 0.71% | 10.17% | 4.60% | 3.01% | -5.19% | 5.77% | 5.65% | 6.53% | 0.28% | 0.80% |
ANBIX AB Bond Inflation Strategy | 0.47% | 7.52% | 3.20% | 5.20% | -8.50% | 6.35% | 9.35% | 9.29% | -0.76% | 2.93% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRBFX achieves a 0.71% return, which is significantly higher than ANBIX's 0.47% return. Over the past 10 years, TRBFX has underperformed ANBIX with an annualized return of 3.22%, while ANBIX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.63% annualized return.
TRBFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 0.71%
- 6M
- 4.30%
- 1Y
- 7.56%
- 3Y*
- 5.46%
- 5Y*
- 3.34%
- 10Y*
- 3.22%
ANBIX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- YTD
- 0.47%
- 6M
- 0.51%
- 1Y
- 3.88%
- 3Y*
- 4.39%
- 5Y*
- 2.48%
- 10Y*
- 3.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TRBFX vs. ANBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRBFX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than ANBIX's 0.59% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TRBFX vs. ANBIX — Risk / Return Rank
TRBFX
ANBIX
TRBFX vs. ANBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund (TRBFX) and AB Bond Inflation Strategy (ANBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TRBFX | ANBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.79 | 1.44 | +0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.04 | 2.17 | +1.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.29 | +0.35 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.72 | 1.95 | +4.77 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.47 | 9.93 | +11.54 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRBFX | ANBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 1.44 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 | 0.55 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | 0.90 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.85 | -0.04 |
Correlation
The correlation between TRBFX and ANBIX is 0.71, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TRBFX vs. ANBIX - Dividend Comparison
TRBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.46%, more than ANBIX's 4.57% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TRBFX T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund | 8.46% | 8.56% | 4.48% | 3.64% | 6.11% | 4.99% | 1.38% | 3.27% | 2.34% | 1.61% | 1.10% | 0.00% |
ANBIX AB Bond Inflation Strategy | 4.57% | 4.93% | 3.86% | 4.55% | 6.47% | 4.70% | 2.22% | 3.19% | 3.39% | 2.05% | 2.13% | 1.61% |
Drawdowns
TRBFX vs. ANBIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRBFX drawdown since its inception was -7.33%, smaller than the maximum ANBIX drawdown of -11.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRBFX and ANBIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRBFX | ANBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.33% | -11.56% | +4.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.24% | -2.09% | +0.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.33% | -10.85% | +3.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -7.33% | -11.56% | +4.23% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.63% | -0.48% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.34% | -2.22% | +0.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.39% | 0.41% | -0.02% |
Volatility
TRBFX vs. ANBIX - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund (TRBFX) and AB Bond Inflation Strategy (ANBIX) have volatilities of 0.83% and 0.85%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TRBFX | ANBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.83% | 0.85% | -0.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.52% | 1.35% | +2.17% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.25% | 2.71% | +1.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.97% | 4.49% | +0.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.89% | 4.03% | -0.14% |