PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRBFX vs. PRSNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRBFX vs. PRSNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund (TRBFX) and T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund (PRSNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRBFX achieves a 1.12% return, which is significantly lower than PRSNX's 1.92% return. Over the past 10 years, TRBFX has underperformed PRSNX with an annualized return of 2.84%, while PRSNX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.90% annualized return.


TRBFX

1D
0.21%
1M
-0.11%
YTD
1.12%
6M
1.34%
1Y
3.58%
3Y*
4.81%
5Y*
2.50%
10Y*
2.84%

PRSNX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.89%
YTD
1.92%
6M
3.45%
1Y
7.63%
3Y*
8.03%
5Y*
2.16%
10Y*
3.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRBFX vs. PRSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRBFX
T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund
1.12%6.34%4.60%3.01%-5.19%5.77%5.65%6.53%0.28%0.80%
PRSNX
T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund
1.92%9.31%5.60%12.77%-16.27%0.40%8.16%11.94%0.45%6.47%

Correlation

The correlation between TRBFX and PRSNX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2015

0.42

Over the past year, the correlation between TRBFX and PRSNX has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.42, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRBFX vs. PRSNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRBFX
TRBFX Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
TRBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
TRBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

PRSNX
PRSNX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
PRSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
PRSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRBFX vs. PRSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund (TRBFX) and T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund (PRSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRBFXPRSNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.91

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.69

-0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.12

3.66

-2.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.22

16.33

-14.12

TRBFX vs. PRSNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRBFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.77, which is lower than the PRSNX Sharpe Ratio of 2.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRBFX and PRSNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRBFX vs. PRSNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRBFX drawdown since its inception was -7.33%, smaller than the maximum PRSNX drawdown of -19.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRBFX and PRSNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRBFXPRSNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.33%

-19.70%

+12.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.48%

-2.18%

-1.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.51%

-2.87%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.33%

-19.70%

+12.37%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.33%

-19.70%

+12.37%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.98%

0.00%

-1.98%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.42%

-2.35%

+0.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.74%

0.48%

+1.26%

Volatility

TRBFX vs. PRSNX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund (TRBFX) has a higher volatility of 0.99% compared to T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund (PRSNX) at 0.68%. This indicates that TRBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PRSNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRBFXPRSNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.99%

0.68%

+0.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.76%

2.30%

-0.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.11%

2.85%

+2.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.15%

4.30%

+0.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.02%

4.13%

-0.11%

TRBFX vs. PRSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRBFX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than PRSNX's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRBFX vs. PRSNX - Dividend Comparison

TRBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.82%, less than PRSNX's 6.63% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PRSNX
T. Rowe Price Global Multi-Sector Bond Fund
6.63%7.87%6.36%5.08%3.30%3.95%3.68%6.33%4.89%3.59%3.44%3.60%
TRBFX
T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund
4.82%4.95%4.48%3.64%6.11%4.99%1.38%3.27%2.34%1.61%1.10%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRBFX and PRSNX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRBFX has higher volatility (0.99%) compared to PRSNX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRBFX dropped -7.33% vs PRSNX's -19.70%.

PRSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.80 vs 0.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRBFX and PRSNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer