PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TRBFX vs. ALMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TRBFX vs. ALMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund (TRBFX) and Invesco Short Duration Inflation Protected Fund (ALMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TRBFX achieves a 0.91% return, which is significantly lower than ALMIX's 0.99% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TRBFX having a 2.80% annualized return and ALMIX not far behind at 2.69%.


TRBFX

1D
-0.21%
1M
-0.32%
YTD
0.91%
6M
1.13%
1Y
3.36%
3Y*
4.74%
5Y*
2.38%
10Y*
2.80%

ALMIX

1D
-0.30%
1M
-0.40%
YTD
0.99%
6M
1.09%
1Y
3.10%
3Y*
4.70%
5Y*
2.70%
10Y*
2.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TRBFX vs. ALMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TRBFX
T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund
0.91%6.34%4.60%3.01%-5.19%5.77%5.65%6.53%0.28%0.80%
ALMIX
Invesco Short Duration Inflation Protected Fund
0.99%6.13%4.29%4.17%-4.35%5.20%5.35%4.84%0.12%0.45%

Correlation

The correlation between TRBFX and ALMIX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2015

0.75

The correlation between TRBFX and ALMIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.66 (1 year) to 0.81 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TRBFX vs. ALMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TRBFX
TRBFX Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
TRBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TRBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
TRBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
TRBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1111
Calmar Ratio Rank
TRBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

ALMIX
ALMIX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
ALMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
ALMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TRBFX vs. ALMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund (TRBFX) and Invesco Short Duration Inflation Protected Fund (ALMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TRBFXALMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.34

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.00

3.17

-2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.96

12.71

-10.76

TRBFX vs. ALMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TRBFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the ALMIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TRBFX and ALMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TRBFX vs. ALMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TRBFX drawdown since its inception was -7.33%, which is greater than ALMIX's maximum drawdown of -6.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRBFX and ALMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TRBFXALMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.33%

-6.61%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.48%

-0.99%

-2.49%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.51%

-1.18%

-2.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.33%

-6.61%

-0.72%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-7.33%

-6.61%

-0.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.19%

-0.99%

-1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.42%

-0.45%

-0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.75%

0.25%

+1.50%

Volatility

TRBFX vs. ALMIX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund (TRBFX) has a higher volatility of 1.01% compared to Invesco Short Duration Inflation Protected Fund (ALMIX) at 0.80%. This indicates that TRBFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ALMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TRBFXALMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.01%

0.80%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.76%

1.43%

+0.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.12%

1.91%

+3.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.15%

3.19%

+1.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.02%

2.71%

+1.31%

TRBFX vs. ALMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TRBFX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than ALMIX's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

TRBFX vs. ALMIX - Dividend Comparison

TRBFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, more than ALMIX's 4.38% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALMIX
Invesco Short Duration Inflation Protected Fund
4.38%4.38%3.00%3.24%7.59%4.38%1.19%2.17%2.80%2.19%1.53%0.09%
TRBFX
T. Rowe Price Limited Duration Inflation Focused Bond Fund
4.83%4.95%4.48%3.64%6.11%4.99%1.38%3.27%2.34%1.61%1.10%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TRBFX and ALMIX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TRBFX has higher volatility (1.01%) compared to ALMIX (0.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TRBFX dropped -7.33% vs ALMIX's -6.61%.

ALMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TRBFX and ALMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer