PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ALMIX vs. TQQQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ALMIX vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Short Duration Inflation Protected Fund (ALMIX) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ALMIX achieves a 1.89% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 64.46% return. Over the past 10 years, ALMIX has underperformed TQQQ with an annualized return of 2.82%, while TQQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 45.33% annualized return.


ALMIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.00%
YTD
1.89%
6M
1.82%
1Y
4.44%
3Y*
5.00%
5Y*
2.86%
10Y*
2.82%

TQQQ

1D
-0.76%
1M
33.35%
YTD
64.46%
6M
55.93%
1Y
137.89%
3Y*
69.49%
5Y*
28.37%
10Y*
45.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ALMIX vs. TQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ALMIX
Invesco Short Duration Inflation Protected Fund
1.89%6.13%4.29%4.17%-4.35%5.20%5.35%4.84%0.12%0.45%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
64.46%34.35%58.27%198.04%-79.09%82.98%110.05%133.84%-19.79%118.06%

Correlation

The correlation between ALMIX and TQQQ is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.05

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2010

0.01

The correlation between ALMIX and TQQQ shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.11 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ALMIX vs. TQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ALMIX
ALMIX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
ALMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ALMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
ALMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
ALMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
ALMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

TQQQ
TQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
TQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
TQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ALMIX vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Short Duration Inflation Protected Fund (ALMIX) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ALMIXTQQQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.40

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.43

3.75

+1.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.83

12.27

+7.57

ALMIX vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ALMIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.42, which is comparable to the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ALMIX and TQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ALMIXTQQQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.42

2.92

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

0.43

+0.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.05

0.69

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.66

0.74

+0.93

Drawdowns

ALMIX vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ALMIX drawdown since its inception was -6.61%, smaller than the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ALMIX and TQQQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ALMIXTQQQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.61%

-81.66%

+75.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.80%

-36.97%

+36.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.18%

-58.04%

+56.86%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-6.61%

-81.66%

+75.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-6.61%

-81.66%

+75.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.76%

+0.66%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.45%

-18.52%

+18.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.22%

11.28%

-11.06%

Volatility

ALMIX vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco Short Duration Inflation Protected Fund (ALMIX) is 0.56%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 13.29%. This indicates that ALMIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ALMIXTQQQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.56%

13.29%

-12.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.26%

36.04%

-34.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.81%

47.60%

-45.79%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.19%

66.53%

-63.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.70%

65.96%

-63.26%

ALMIX vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

ALMIX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than TQQQ's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

ALMIX vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

ALMIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, more than TQQQ's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ALMIX
Invesco Short Duration Inflation Protected Fund
4.34%4.38%3.00%3.24%7.59%4.38%1.19%2.17%2.80%2.19%1.53%0.09%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
0.36%0.65%1.27%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions


ALMIX and TQQQ have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TQQQ has higher volatility (13.29%) compared to ALMIX (0.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ALMIX dropped -6.61% vs TQQQ's -81.66%.

TQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.92 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ALMIX and TQQQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer