TRBF vs. KDRN
TRBF (Angel Oak Total Return ETF) and KDRN (Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TRBF charges 0.44%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for KDRN.
Performance
TRBF vs. KDRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TRBF achieves a 0.52% return, which is significantly lower than KDRN's 1.20% return.
TRBF
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- 0.08%
- YTD
- 0.52%
- 6M
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
KDRN
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 1.20%
- 6M
- 0.96%
- 1Y
- 2.68%
- 3Y*
- 3.46%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TRBF vs. KDRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TRBF Angel Oak Total Return ETF | 0.52% | 0.96% |
KDRN Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF | 1.20% | 0.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between TRBF and KDRN is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 8, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TRBF vs. KDRN — Risk / Return Rank
TRBF
KDRN
TRBF vs. KDRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Angel Oak Total Return ETF (TRBF) and Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF (KDRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TRBF | KDRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.78 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.13 | +0.47 |
Drawdowns
TRBF vs. KDRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TRBF drawdown since its inception was -2.59%, smaller than the maximum KDRN drawdown of -15.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TRBF and KDRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TRBF | KDRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.59% | -15.29% | +12.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -4.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.48% | -0.83% | -0.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.80% | -4.76% | +3.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.90% | — |
Volatility
TRBF vs. KDRN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TRBF | KDRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.72% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 2.06% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.76% | 3.53% | +0.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.76% | 6.60% | -2.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.76% | 6.60% | -2.84% |
TRBF vs. KDRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
TRBF has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than KDRN's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
TRBF vs. KDRN - Dividend Comparison
TRBF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.14%, which matches KDRN's 3.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
KDRN Kingsbarn Tactical Bond ETF | 3.11% | 2.54% | 2.83% | 2.84% | 2.11% |
TRBF Angel Oak Total Return ETF | 3.14% | 1.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TRBF and KDRN have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TRBF is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TRBF is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for KDRN.
TRBF has the higher dividend yield at 3.14%, compared with 3.11% for KDRN.
They also come from different issuers: Angel Oak and Kingsbarn. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TRBF and 1.09% for KDRN.
Find the right allocation for TRBF and KDRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer