TQSMX vs. LMSIX

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

TQSMX (T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund) and LMSIX (Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TQSMX returned 13.13%/yr vs 11.86%/yr for LMSIX. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. TQSMX charges 0.87%/yr vs 1.03%/yr for LMSIX.

Performance

TQSMX vs. LMSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (TQSMX) and Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (LMSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TQSMX achieves a 17.25% return, which is significantly lower than LMSIX's 18.43% return. Over the past 10 years, TQSMX has outperformed LMSIX with an annualized return of 13.13%, while LMSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.86% annualized return.

TQSMX

• 1D: -1.76%
• 1M: 3.68%
• YTD: 17.25%
• 6M: 14.75%
• 1Y: 30.24%
• 3Y*: 20.67%
• 5Y*: 11.80%
• 10Y*: 13.13%

LMSIX

• 1D: -1.14%
• 1M: 4.76%
• YTD: 18.43%
• 6M: 15.69%
• 1Y: 40.83%
• 3Y*: 22.29%
• 5Y*: 9.76%
• 10Y*: 11.86%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TQSMX vs. LMSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
TQSMX T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund	17.25%	12.75%	16.34%	21.72%	-13.07%	21.85%	11.68%	30.19%	-10.91%	15.44%
LMSIX Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund	18.43%	20.19%	9.90%	18.80%	-15.16%	29.12%	11.29%	20.75%	-15.61%	8.81%

Correlation

The correlation between TQSMX and LMSIX is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.96
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 29, 2016	0.95

The correlation between TQSMX and LMSIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TQSMX vs. LMSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TQSMX

TQSMX Risk / Return Rank: 60
TQSMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
TQSMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
TQSMX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
TQSMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
TQSMX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

LMSIX

LMSIX Risk / Return Rank: 78
LMSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 74
LMSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
LMSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 61
LMSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
LMSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TQSMX vs. LMSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (TQSMX) and Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (LMSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TQSMX	LMSIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.85	2.25	-0.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.65	3.12	-0.48
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.38	-0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.05	4.61	-1.55
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.16	15.94	-3.78

TQSMX vs. LMSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TQSMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the LMSIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TQSMX and LMSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TQSMX vs. LMSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TQSMX drawdown since its inception was -40.66%, smaller than the maximum LMSIX drawdown of -61.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQSMX and LMSIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	TQSMX	LMSIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.66%	-61.16%	+20.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.38%	-9.22%	-1.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-23.82%	-26.80%	+2.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.82%	-27.66%	+3.84%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.66%	-50.26%	+9.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.76%	-1.14%	-0.62%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.15%	-10.86%	+5.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.60%	2.66%	-0.06%

Volatility

TQSMX vs. LMSIX - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund (TQSMX) has a higher volatility of 6.41% compared to Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund (LMSIX) at 5.87%. This indicates that TQSMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LMSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TQSMX	LMSIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.41%	5.87%	+0.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.56%	13.56%	0.00%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.15%	18.87%	-1.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.65%	22.00%	-2.35%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.38%	23.50%	-3.12%

TQSMX vs. LMSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TQSMX has a 0.87% expense ratio, which is lower than LMSIX's 1.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

TQSMX vs. LMSIX - Dividend Comparison

TQSMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.98%, less than LMSIX's 6.81% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
LMSIX Franklin U.S. Small Cap Equity Fund	6.81%	6.35%	4.05%	3.70%	5.18%	21.64%	3.60%	1.48%	11.17%	8.85%	4.79%	7.52%
TQSMX T. Rowe Price Integrated US Small-Mid Cap Equity Fund	0.98%	1.15%	6.48%	3.39%	6.06%	1.40%	0.81%	1.18%	2.12%	0.35%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TQSMX and LMSIX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, TQSMX and LMSIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, TQSMX or LMSIX?

TQSMX has higher volatility (6.41%) compared to LMSIX (5.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TQSMX dropped -40.66% vs LMSIX's -61.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

LMSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.25 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.