TQSIX vs. FDEGX
Compare and contrast key facts about T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small & Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund (TQSIX) and Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX).
TQSIX is managed by T. Rowe Price. It was launched on Feb 26, 2016. FDEGX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 28, 1990.
Performance
TQSIX vs. FDEGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TQSIX vs. FDEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TQSIX T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small & Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund | -2.09% | 12.94% | 16.54% | 21.99% | -12.97% | 22.12% | 11.92% | 30.43% | -10.78% | 15.52% |
FDEGX Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund | -7.25% | 2.88% | 26.57% | 20.93% | -26.50% | 21.30% | 29.34% | 36.59% | -6.92% | 21.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TQSIX achieves a -2.09% return, which is significantly higher than FDEGX's -7.25% return. Over the past 10 years, TQSIX has outperformed FDEGX with an annualized return of 11.39%, while FDEGX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.27% annualized return.
TQSIX
- 1D
- -1.55%
- 1M
- -9.20%
- YTD
- -2.09%
- 6M
- -0.11%
- 1Y
- 16.91%
- 3Y*
- 14.84%
- 5Y*
- 8.79%
- 10Y*
- 11.39%
FDEGX
- 1D
- -2.00%
- 1M
- -11.55%
- YTD
- -7.25%
- 6M
- -18.20%
- 1Y
- 3.75%
- 3Y*
- 10.51%
- 5Y*
- 5.38%
- 10Y*
- 10.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TQSIX vs. FDEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TQSIX has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FDEGX's 0.63% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TQSIX vs. FDEGX — Risk / Return Rank
TQSIX
FDEGX
TQSIX vs. FDEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small & Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund (TQSIX) and Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TQSIX | FDEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.80 | 0.13 | +0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.25 | 0.36 | +0.89 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.05 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.04 | -0.02 | +1.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.44 | -0.06 | +4.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TQSIX | FDEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 0.13 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.23 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.47 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.38 | +0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between TQSIX and FDEGX is 0.85, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TQSIX vs. FDEGX - Dividend Comparison
TQSIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, while FDEGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TQSIX T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small & Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund | 1.35% | 1.32% | 6.61% | 3.55% | 6.35% | 1.58% | 0.81% | 1.24% | 2.28% | 0.42% | 0.88% | 0.00% |
FDEGX Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 7.89% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 14.15% | 8.37% | 3.65% | 0.75% | 0.05% | 0.59% | 0.13% |
Drawdowns
TQSIX vs. FDEGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TQSIX drawdown since its inception was -40.65%, smaller than the maximum FDEGX drawdown of -85.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TQSIX and FDEGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TQSIX | FDEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.65% | -85.96% | +45.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.06% | -20.45% | +6.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.76% | -36.62% | +12.86% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -40.65% | -36.62% | -4.03% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.41% | -20.45% | +10.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.17% | -36.96% | +31.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.29% | 7.11% | -3.82% |
Volatility
TQSIX vs. FDEGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for T. Rowe Price QM U.S. Small & Mid-Cap Core Equity Fund (TQSIX) is 6.46%, while Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX) has a volatility of 7.61%. This indicates that TQSIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TQSIX | FDEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.46% | 7.61% | -1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.91% | 18.02% | -6.11% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.88% | 26.61% | -5.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.37% | 23.11% | -3.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.23% | 21.85% | -1.62% |